The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate tailored duration of long-term anticoagulant treatment after a first venous thromboembolism based on individualized risk assessments of recurrent VTE and major bleeding risks. Participants will be asked to fill in a questionnaire and take a buccal swab, which are used for an individual estimation of the risks of recurrent VTE and bleeding. Based on these risks a treatment advise will be made, or randomised in a subgroup of patients.
Background: Patients with a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence. A recurrent VTE can be prevented by prolonged anticoagulant therapy, but this may come at the cost of major bleeding. The L-TRRiP and VTE-BLEED prediction scores have been developed to classify the risk of recurrent VTE (low, intermediate, high) and major bleeding (low vs high), respectively. However, their combined use in finding the optimal balance to minimize both long-term risks is unclear. Aims: To evaluate tailored duration of long-term anticoagulant treatment based on individualized risk assessments of recurrent VTE and major bleeding risks. Methods: The L-TRRiP study is a multicenter, open-label, cohort based randomized controlled trial in which patients with a first VTE will be included. For each patient the risk of recurrent VTE (low, medium, high) and major bleeding (low, high) will be determined using the L-TRRiP and VTE-BLEED prediction scores, respectively. After three months of initial anticoagulant therapy, patients with a low recurrent VTE risk (\<6% in 2 years) will discontinue anticoagulants, whereas patients with a high recurrent VTE risk(\>14% in 2 years) and low major bleeding risk will continue. The other groups, with unclear benefit of prolonged treatment, will be randomized to continue or discontinue anticoagulants. Patients will be followed for at least two years, during which they will be asked to fill in a questionnaire every 3 months during the first two years, followed by a questionnaire once a year for the remaining duration of the study (i.e., 2 years after inclusion of the last participant; which is expected to be in 2027). The total follow-up duration is therefore expected to vary between 2 to 6 years. The follow-up questionnaires are used to screen for potential outcomes (including recurrent VTE and bleeding), and includes the EQ-5D-5L to assess quality of life, the Post VTE functional status scale to assess functional outcomes and the Medical Consumption and Productivity Costs Questionnaire to asses cost-effectiveness. In case of a potential outcome additional information is retrieved from the medical record for adjudication. The clinical outcomes will be evaluated and classified by an independent committee blinded for treatment allocation. Sample size: The sample size of this study is based on the randomized part of the study. To demonstrate a 7% difference in the combined endpoint (i.e., 10.6% vs 3.6%) with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 90%, a sample size of 552 subjects for the randomized part of the study is required. Taking into account a drop-out rate of 10%, the aim is to include 608 patients in the randomized part of the study. After inclusion of 608 randomized patients, inclusion will stop. Based on the derivation studies it is expected the randomized group will form about 40% of the total included population, in which case the estimated total number of included patients will be 1600. Of note, this total number may change depending on the final proportion of the randomized group. Ethics: The study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Leiden Den Haag Delft. All participants will provide informed consent.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
608
Randomisation to continue or discontinue anticoagulant therapy in 1:1 ratio stratified on risk category of L-TRRiP and VTE-BLEED score
Predict bleeding risk during extended anticoagulant treatment (high or low) using the VTE-BLEED score
Predict VTE recurrence risk after anticoagulant discontinuation (high, intermediate or low) using the L-TRRiP score
Advise to continue anticoagulant treatment after 3 months for patients with high VTE recurrence and low bleeding risk
Advise to discontinue anticoagulant treatment after 3 months for patients with low VTE recurrence risk
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Amsterdam Medical Center, location AMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Assen, Netherlands
Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis
Beverwijk, Netherlands
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, Netherlands
Deventer Ziekenhuis
Deventer, Netherlands
Nij Smellinghe Ziekenhuis
Drachten, Netherlands
Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei
Ede, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Admiraal de Ruyter Ziekenhuis
Goes, Netherlands
...and 9 more locations
Recurrent VTE and major bleeding
Incidence of the combined endpoint recurrent VTE and major bleeding in the randomised arms
Time frame: 2 years
Primary outcome weighted for quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Recurrent VTE and major bleeding weighted for the impact on quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: 2 years
Primary outcome weighted for functional status (PFVS)
Recurrent VTE and major bleeding weighted for the impact on functional limitations as measured by the Post-VTE functional status scale (PFVS) a grade for functional outcomes after a VTE, ranging from grade 0 (no functional limitations, symptoms, pain or anxiety) to grade 4 (severe functional limitations, requiring assistance in activities of daily living) or death..
Time frame: 2 years
Cost-effectiveness
For the analysis of cost-effectiveness health care costs and productivity losses will be measured every 3 months during follow-up by the Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Productivity Costs Questionnaire from the institute for Medical Technology Assessment. Health care costs will be calculated using Dutch standard prices for economic evaluations. Absence from work will be valued with friction cost method. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L score, which is taken every 3 months during follow-up, using the area-under-the-curve approach. Economic evaluation will consists of both a study-based cost-effectiveness analysis (cost per event) as well as cost-utility analysis with a lifetime horizon (costs per QALY).
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Recurrent VTE and major bleeding in non-randomised arms
Incidence of the combined endpoint in the non-randomised arms
Time frame: 2 years
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding
Incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in different study arms
Time frame: 2 years
Reccurent VTE, major bleeding and clinically relevant - non Major bleeding during entire follow-up
Incidence of recurrent VTE, major bleeding and clinically relevant bleeding in different study arms for the entire duration of follow-up (expected to vary between 2 to 6 years)
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Predictive performance of the L-TRRiP model
Discrimination and calibration of L-TRRiP model in the arms that discontinue anticoagulant treatment
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Predictive performance of the VTE-BLEED model
Discrimination and calibration of the L-TRRiP model in the arms that continue anticoagulant treatment
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Natural course of recovery
Natural course of recovery with regard to long-term functional limitations, measured by post VTE functional status scale every 3 months through the follow-up period of 2 years. Using the post VTE functional status scale (PFVS) a grade for functional outcomes after a VTE, ranging from grade 0 (no functional limitations, symptoms, pain or anxiety) to grade 4 (severe functional limitations, requiring assistance in activities of daily living) or death.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.