Study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of Lazolex®, an emollient gel, to treat mucocutaneous lesions caused by herpes simplex virus.
A single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial was conducted with 30 patients divided into two groups: 15 patients with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infections and 15 with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infections. All received topical treatment with Lazolex® Gel four times daily for 10 days. The efficacy and tolerance of the treatment were evaluated on day 10 and day 20 after the study started. In addition, recurrence rates were evaluated before treatment with Lazolex® and after a 4-year follow-up period after treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Four times a day over a 10-day period
Course of the disease
Lazolex® Gel was classified as effective if herpes lesions improved or healed after treatment. The median effective time (ET50), defined as the time (in days) needed to reach complete recovery in 50% of the patients, was used as the main variable for Lazolex® Gel efficacy.
Time frame: 10 days
Change in outbreak frequency
Lazolex® Gel was classified as effective if herpes lesions improved or healed after treatment. The median effective time (ET50), defined as the time (in days) needed to reach complete recovery in 50% of the patients, was used as the main variable for Lazolex® Gel efficacy.
Time frame: 10 days
Change in outbreak frequency
Change in outbreaks along time
Time frame: 4 years
The degree of patient satisfaction
The level of patient satisfaction with treatment efficacy was categorized as high, medium, or low using a self-questionnaire.
Time frame: 10 days
Number of complaints and symptoms
Tolerance outcomes were evaluated using both objective and subjective criteria. The objective criteria included the comparison of laboratory tests and physical examinations before and after Lazolex® Gel treatment. The subjective criteria included complaints and symptoms reported by patients. In the event of adverse reactions, they were assessed by attending physicians. Individual tolerance was categorized as follows: Very satisfactory: No clinically significant changes in physical examination or laboratory tests, and no adverse reactions. Satisfactory: Insignificant changes in physical examination or laboratory tests, or mild adverse reactions that do not require a change in treatment. Unsatisfactory: Significant changes in physical examination or laboratory tests and/or the occurrence of adverse reactions that require the withdrawal of the product, as well as prescribing treatment to address the adverse reaction
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 10 days