The aim of the project is to test the effectiveness of robot-assisted upper-limb exercise in persons after cervical spinal cord injury. In a randomised controlled two-arm trial, the effect of adding two types of robot-assisted upper-limb exercise to standard occupational therapy will be tested. Three primary and two secondary outcomes will be assessed using well-established measures.
Unlike for persons after stroke, there is no high-quality evidence of the effectiveness of robot-assisted upper-limb exercise in persons after cervical spinal cord injury. For this reason, we are aiming to conduct a randomised trial. The trial will involve two groups of adult patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. One group will receive standard occupational therapy, tailored to the patient's needs and abilities, five times per week for 90 minutes. In addition to the standard occupational therapy, the other group will receive ten 30-minute session of robot-assisted exercise: five sessions of exercise for fingers and hand using a specialised device, and five sessions of gross-motor exercise using an exoskeleton. Three outcome measures will be used to comprehensively assess the patients at the beginning and at the end of the intervention, i.e., upon admission and discharge: the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP; general and Myelopathy version), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The progress in those measures will be compared between the two groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Standard occupational therapy as part of inpatient rehabilitation
Exercise for fingers and hand using Amadeo device plus gross-motor exercise using Armeo Spring exoskeleton
University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
Ljubljana, Slovenia
RECRUITINGDifference in Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension Version 2 (GRASSP V2) score
Clinical impairment measure specific to the upper limb for use after tetraplegia that measures sensorimotor and prehension function through three domains; total score for each body side ranges from 0 to 94; higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: Before intervention (at admission) and after the intervention (on average after 3 weeks)
Difference in Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension - Mielopathy (GRASSP-M) score
Objective tool designed to characterize patients' functional impairment related to the upper limb, useful for diagnosing and quantifying mild dysfunction and monitoring patients for deterioration; total score for each body side ranges from 0 to 74; higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: Before intervention (at admission) and after the intervention (on average after 3 weeks)
Difference in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) score
Assessement of performance in activities of daily living and mobility for individuals with spinal cord injury; score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: Before intervention (at admission) and after the intervention (on average after 3 weeks)
Difference in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) results
Individualized, client-centred outcome measure designed to capture a client's self-perception of performance in everyday living, over time; performance and satisfaction scores range from 1 to 10; higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: Before intervention (at admission) and after the intervention (on average after 3 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.