This is a single-site, non-randomized, non-controlled study at UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas in the Department of Plastic Surgery. The study is designed to follow up to 15 consenting subjects who may receive up to 2 BBL/MOXI/HALO treatments under an IRB approved protocol.
Subjects will receive 1-2 BBL/MOXI/HALO treatments. All 2nd treatments will be scheduled 4-8 weeks after the initial treatment to ensure the skin has enough time to recover. Overall assessments will be collected before the first treatment and at subsequent follow-up visits at 1 Month and 3 Months post final treatment. Identifiable full-face standard and close-up photography will be obtained and used to evaluate any changes. Subjects will also have photos obtained with the VISIA-CR Imaging System (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ). Quantitative analysis will be completed on the VISIA imaging system and be used to compare the effects of the treatments. Any improvements will be evaluated to pre-treatment assessments.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
Sciton Joule System
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Change in Brown Spots at 1 Month From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Brown Spots at 3 Months From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Brown Spots at 1 Month From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Brown Spots at 3 Months From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Pores at 1 Month From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall pore count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Pores at 3 Months From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall pore count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Pores at 1 Month From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall pore count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Pores at 3 Months From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall pore count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Porphyrins at 1 Month From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall porphyrins count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Porphyrins at 3 Months From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall porphyrins count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Porphyrins at 1 Month From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall porphyrins count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Porphyrins at 3 Months From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall porphyrins count using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Red Features at 1 Month From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall red features using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Red Features at 3 Months From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall red features using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Red Features at 1 Month From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall red features using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Red Features at 3 Months From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall red features using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Texture at 1 Month From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall texture using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects. Skin analysis is performed by the system to generate a numerical roughness count by providing a tally of the feature. A lower value signifies improvement. Minimum and Maximum value does not exist. The value is an Absolute Score derived from the integration of multiple topographical variables; because it measures the intensity of texture rather than a specific length or depth, it has no standard metric unit
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Texture at 3 Months From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall texture using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects. Skin analysis is performed by the system to generate a numerical roughness count by providing a tally of the feature. A lower value signifies improvement. Minimum and Maximum value does not exist. The value is an Absolute Score derived from the integration of multiple topographical variables; because it measures the intensity of texture rather than a specific length or depth, it has no standard metric unit
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Texture at 1 Month From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall texture using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects. Skin analysis is performed by the system to generate a numerical roughness count by providing a tally of the feature. A lower value signifies improvement. Minimum and Maximum value does not exist. The value is an Absolute Score derived from the integration of multiple topographical variables; because it measures the intensity of texture rather than a specific length or depth, it has no standard metric unit
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Texture at 3 Months From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall texture using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects. Skin analysis is performed by the system to generate a numerical roughness count by providing a tally of the feature. A lower value signifies improvement. Minimum and Maximum value does not exist. The value is an Absolute Score derived from the integration of multiple topographical variables; because it measures the intensity of texture rather than a specific length or depth, it has no standard metric unit
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in UV Spots at 1 Month From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in UV Spots at 3 Months From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in UV Spots at 1 Month From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in UV Spots at 3 Months From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall UV spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Visible Spots at 1 Month From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall visible spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Visible Spots at 3 Months From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall visible spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Visible Spots at 1 Month From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall visible spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Visible Spots at 3 Months From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall visible spots using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Total Wrinkle Area at 1 Month From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall wrinkle are using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Total Wrinkle Area at 3 Months From Baseline (Single Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall wrinkle are using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Change in Total Wrinkle Area at 1 Month From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall wrinkle are using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month
Change in Total Wrinkle Area at 3 Months From Baseline (Double Treatment Group)
Quantitively assessment of change in overall wrinkle are using measurements provided VISIA 3D analysis on different sides of the face for all subjects A lower value signifies improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months