New-onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial arrythmia (AA) in general, is important as it exposes patients to stroke or other embolic complications not to mention the risk of heart failure. AF detection in high risk populations such as patients with a recent stroke or TIA or, symptomatic patients with multiple risk factors for AF, is performed with long-term electrocardiography monitoring using frequently implantable loop recorders (ILR). These recorders have their own limitations related to the invasive nature of the device implanted under the skin of the chest with limited acceptation by the patients. Smart watches appear as useful alternatives, but they need to be evaluated in an all-comer population of patients highly exposed to AF, different from the large population studies conducted in healthy young adults with a low incidence of AF. The unique features of CardiacSense Medical System suggest that we could have an accurate noninvasive detection of AF in a selected population very much exposed to the risk of atrial fibrillation, the most frequent atrial arrhythmia.
Study design : This clinical investigation is a comparative, non-randomised, one group, controlled study. Each patient represents its own control. The study will envolve 400 participants Hypothesis : Our hypothesis is that CardiacSense Medical System is an effective, safe, and better accepted alternative for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) in a high-risk population than implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Population : Any patient aged 18 years or more, with an ILR implanted for the detection of AF will be eligible. The time of implantation will not matter as long as the batteries work. Each patient will be proposed a CS Medical Watch for a period corresponding to the period at risk of AF. Main objective : To compare the performance of the CardiacSense Medical Watch by pulse plethysmography (PPG) only to the gold standard method of ILR monitoring, to detect AF that lasts 5 minutes or more, in a population of patients at high risk of paroxysmal AF.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
400
The Use of the CS Medical Watch during the participation period of the clinical investigation (between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF).
Specific questionnaire during the last study visit (takes place at M3 to M12 according to the period at risk of AF)
The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring
The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring using the CardiacSense Medical Watch by pulse plethysmography (PPG) only vs the gold standard method of ILR ECG recording, over the same period of monitoring by the two devices for each patient.
Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF
The total number of AA episodes that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring
The total number of AA episodes that lasts 5 min or more detected by PPG and confirmed by ECG measurement of the CardiacSense Medical Watch (vs. ILR ECG recording) over the same period of monitoring by the two devices for each patient.
Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF
The total number of episodes AF that lasts 5 min or more recorded on long-term monitoring
Same primary endpoint for symptomatic patients vs. asymptomatic patients
Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF
The total duration of AF episodes that lasts 5 min or more
Total duration of AF episodes that lasts 5 min or more / total duration of monitoring expressed in % for each device (PPG CS watch only vs. ILR ECG recording).
Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF
Incidence and severity of CS device vs ILR devices
Related Adverse Events and incidents during the patient participation
Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF
Degree of invasiveness, comfort, and ease of use of both devices
Description : measured using specific questionnaires for the study
Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF
Medico-economic evaluation according to the AP-HP hospital costs
* The cost of each medical device (considering the replacement when needed over the study period for each patient) * The cost for extra-consultation/hospitalization for surgery, complication, or education.
Time frame: between 3 and 12 months according to the period at risk of AF
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.