Graded motor imagery (GMI) clinical conditions accompanied by many pain and movement problems; It is a treatment, education and rehabilitation process that is based on recently obtained scientific data and current clinical studies, is individually adapted and approaches the individual holistically with a biopsychosocial model. Nowadays, it is frequently used in the treatment of some neurological diseases. In addition, these approaches are also used in the treatment of some orthopedic diseases including chronic pain. There are a limited number of studies in which the mentioned approaches are used together in stages, and the stages are mostly used alone. Despite these positive results in favor of GMI, the fact that there is no study using the entire GMI treatment in chronic shoulder pain shows us that a randomized controlled and blinded study with high evidence value should be conducted on this subject. In addition, determining the effect of GMI on changes such as fear of pain, two-point discrimination, and left/right lateralization speed and accuracy task will help fill the literature gaps on this subject. In the light of this information, the question of planned master's thesis study is the effect of GMI treatment applied in addition to traditional physiotherapy in chronic rotator cuff-related shoulder pain on pain level, joint range of motion, functionality, pain-related fear, two-point discrimination and left/right lateralization speed and accuracy compared to only traditional physiotherapy. whether it is superior or not.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
30
The three different treatment techniques include left/right discrimination training, explicit motor imagery exercises and mirror therapy. These techniques are delivered sequentially but require a flexible approach from the patient and clinician to move forwards, backward and sideways in the treatment process to suit the individual. With patience, persistence and often lots of hard work, GMI gives new hope for treatment outcomes.
This protocol included stretching and strengthening exercises. Self-stretching will encapsulate the upper trapezius, pectoralis minor, posterior. Each stretch will consist of 3 repetitions of 30 seconds with a 30 second break between repetitions. Strengthening exercises will be performed using elastic resistance bands (Theraband ®) with 4 levels of resistance (red, green, blue and grey). Sets can be easily changed (without the person reporting muscle fatigue) and progressed with resistance. The therapist will ask about the level of effort required for exercise exercises and whether it would be possible to increase the resistance level. The exercise consists of three sets of 10 repetitions and is completed with 1 rest between them. Strengthening exercises will include prone extension, prone external rotation with abduction, side lying external rotation and serratus anterior strengthening.
Acıbadem University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11)
he Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11) is an 11-point scale for self-report of pain. It is the most commonly used unidimensional pain scale. The respondent selects a whole number (integers 0-10) that best reflects the intensity (or other quality if requested of his/her pain).0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Time frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 6th week
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was developed to measure current shoulder pain and disability in an outpatient setting. The SPADI contains 13 items that assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability between 0 to 100, with a higher value indicating worse condition.
Time frame: Change from baseline score of The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 6th week
Global Rating of Change scale
Patient satisfaction regarding improvement in shoulder function will be evaluated by the Global Rating of Change scale. All participants will be asked to rate their condition after a six-week intervention period compared to baseline by indicating whether they have improved significantly, improved slightly, unchanged, deteriorated slightly, or deteriorated significantly between -3 to +3, with a higher value indicating better condition in this study.
Time frame: Change from baseline Global Rating of Change scale at 6th week
Central Sensitization Scale
Central Sensitization Scale, which can be applied in the presence of chronic pain, is used in central sensitization syndromes. It consists of two parts. Part A of the scale includes a Likert scale (0-4 points) that questions health-related symptoms. This section is scored from 0 to 100, with higher numbers being associated with a higher degree of central sensitization. Scores of 40 and above indicate the presence of central sensitization. In section B, it questions whether any of the central sensitization syndromes have been diagnosed before.
Time frame: Change from baseline score of Central Sensitization Scale scale at 6th week
Range of motion
Shoulder range of motion is the capability of a joint to go through its complete spectrum of movements.
Time frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 6th week]
Pressure Pain Threshold
A digital pressure algometer will be applied to the web space of the foot opposite the trigger point. Participants are instructed to say "stop" or "pain" so the stimulus can be terminated "when the sensation first transitions from pressure to pain" (pain threshold).
Time frame: Change from baseline Pressure Pain Threshold at 6th week
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report measure designed to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults with or without chronic pain.The person may score a total of 52 (Pain Catastrophizing Scale). A high score indicates a high level of catastrophic.
Time frame: Change from baseline score of Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6th week
Fear avoidance belief questionnaire (FABQ)
Fear avoidance belief questionnaire FABQ) is a questionnaire based on the fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception. The FABQ measures patient's fear of pain and consequent avoidance of physical activity (PA) because of their fear.There is a maximum score of 96. A higher score indicates more strongly held fear avoidance beliefs. There are two subscales within the FABQ; the work subscale (FABQw) with 7 questions (maximum score of 42) and the physical activity subscale (FABQpa) with 4 questions (maximum score of 24)
Time frame: Change from baseline score of Fear avoidance belief questionnaire at 6th week
The two-point discrimination test
The two-point discrimination test is used to assess if the patient is able to identify two close points on a small area of skin, and how fine the ability to discriminate this are. It is a measure of tactile agnosia, or the inability to recognize these two points despite intact cutaneous sensation and proprioception
Time frame: Change from baseline two-point discrimination at 6th week
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Left/right discrimination (Lateralization)
Right-Left Discrimination will be evaluated with Recognise™ applications (Shoulder and Hand) developed by the "Neuro Orthopedic Institute".
Time frame: Change from baseline Left/right discrimination at 6th week
Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ)
Motor imagery ability will be assessed with the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ). The participant gives a score between 1 and 5 for the image he/she imagines: "1 point: no image, 5 points: as clear as the original." This process is repeated for each task and at the end of the survey, kinesthetic imagery score, visual imagery score and total score are calculated.
Time frame: Change from baseline Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire at 6th week