Participants will be divided into groups. In group A, Composite restoration done using oblique incremental technique. In group B, Bulk-fill technique was used. VAS scoring to evaluate the primary outcome at one day, one week and two weeks.
After the approval from ethical research committee, a written informed consent taken. Participants were briefed about the intervention with its associated merits and demerits. The restorative procedures were accomplished under rubber dam isolation using adequate local anesthesia. The principles of minimally intervention and adhesive dentistry were employed. Participants were allocated into two groups. In group A, restorative interventive was performed using Oblique incremental placement while in group B, Bulk-fill technique was used. Post-operative sensitivity was recorded at one day, one week and two week follow up using a Visual analogue scale.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
90
In this interventional group, a Nanohybrid composite resin Nexcomp (Meta Biomed, Korea) was placed using an oblique incremental technique with increments not exceeding 2 mm in thickness.
In this group, a composite Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU dental) was utilized for restorative purposes using a bulk-fill technique with a thickness of 4 mm
School of Dentistry, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
Islamabad, Pakistan
Post-operative sensitivity in composite resin restoration
Evaluation of post-restorative sensitivity in composite restorations using Visual analogue scale score with scoring from 0 to 10. Score 0 (none), 1 to 3 (mild), 4 to 6 (moderate), and 7 to 10 (severe).
Time frame: Two weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.