Evaluation of Masseter and Anterior Temporalis Muscles Activity After Locating Centric Relation

Overview

Statement of the Problem: To create optimum maxillomandibular relationships, ease discomfort, and restore function, occlusal devices are used, therefore, these devices are of great importance in the field of prosthodontics. Literature is scarce regarding the effect of various methods used in locating centric relation on muscle activity, in addition to which method is most accepted by the patients for whom centric relation is being located. Null hypothesis: There will be no difference in Masseter and Anterior Temporalis muscles activity and patient satisfaction after using the Leaf Gauge, The Lucia Jig and the Kois Deprogrammer.

Research Question: Which of the investigated methods will result in lower masseter and anterior temporalis muscles activity reading after locating centric relation in healthy adults, and will be more accepted by the patient? Rationale for Carrying out the Trial: For the patient: The results of the trial will identify the most effective and patient friendly method for locating a centric position, which instructions are easy to follow and apply. Furthermore, reaching a centric position, using one of the investigated methods, will help ensure orthopedic stability before, during and after the treatment process. For the dentist: The results of the trial will help the dentist decide on which is the most reliable, valid and least technique sensitive method to choose when facing clinical situations requiring occlusal analysis, recording the patient's CR, or occlusal equilibration. Choice of Comparators: The control for the proposed study is a negative control. sEMG readings will be recorded before (-ve control) and after using any of the investigated methods and locating centric relation. Comparison between the pre and post readings for each method used will allow for evaluation of efficacy and reliability for each of the investigated methods. Another reason for using a negative control is that, among the methods currently in the literature, not a single one was labelled the gold standard, nor a consensus has been reached as to which method checks most of the requirements of the ideal device used to locate the centric relation. Each method still has its advantages, disadvantages and most importantly, indications and contraindications. Aim of the Study: The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate Masseter and Anterior Temporalis muscles activity after using different methods: the Leaf Gauge, the Lucia Jig and the Kois Deprogrammer to locate centric relation in healthy adults (Primary Outcome). Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate the patient satisfaction after using each of the investigated methods (Secondary Outcome). PICOS: Population: Healthy adults with no history of TMD. Interventions: I1: The Leaf Gauge I2: The Lucia Jig I3: The Kois Deprogrammer Control: - (-ve Control) Outcomes: Primary (O1): Masseter and Anterior Temporalis muscles activity Secondary (O2): Patient satisfaction Study Design: Randomized cross-over clinical trial Interventions: Interventions will be carried out by the principal investigator. Initial examination and primary impressions: Full medical and dental history will be taken from the participants and TMJ examination will be done to ensure that the eligibility criteria will be met. Intraoral scans for the upper and lower arch and the buccal bite will be done for each participant. Impressions will be sent to the lab for the fabrication of the Kois Deprogrammer. For Group Lf-La-Ks: On the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Kois deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day. For Group La-Ks-Lf: On the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Kois deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day. For Group Ks-Lf-La: On the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Koid deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day. Sample Size: Sample size was calculated using a previous study as reference. This study aimed to compare the muscle activity of masseter and anterior temporalis muscles after using different methods to achieve centric relation in normal subjects According to this study, the response of matched pairs is normally distributed with standard deviation 4.01. If the estimated difference in the mean response of matched pairs is 4.5, the minimally accepted sample size is 8, with probability (power) 0.8. The Type I error probability associated with this test is 0.05. Total sample size was increased to 10 per group (Total sample size will be 30 for all groups). Sample size was calculated by using PS Software. Data collection methods Muscle activity reading before and after using the investigated devices to locate centric relation will be recorded and logged into a Microsoft Excel sheet. Telephone numbers of all patients included the study will be recorded as a part of the written consent. All patients will be given a phone call at least a day before they must show up for each procedure. Analysis will be performed on a per-protocol basis; participants who do not show-up will not be included in the analysis. Data management: All data will be entered and saved electronically. Patient files are to be stored in numerical order and stored in secured file. Data will be encrypted using a password. All data will be maintained after completion of the study. Statistical methods: Handling of numerical/quantitative variables: Numerical data will be explored for normality by checking the data distribution using Kolmogorov- Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Data will be presented as mean \& standard deviation. If data will be normally distributed comparison between 2 different groups will be performed by using Independent t-test, comparison between 2 related groups will be performed by using Paired t-test, while comparison between more than 2 groups will be performed by using One Way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons. If data will be non- parametric data comparison between 2 different groups will be performed by using Mann- Whitney test, comparison between 2 related groups will be performed by using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, while comparison between more than 2 groups will be performed by using Kruskal-Wallis test. Handling of categorial / qualitative variables: Data will be presented as frequency and percentages. All comparisons will be performed by using Chi square test. Monitoring No formal data monitoring committee will be needed since it is a study with known minimal risks. Harms Patients will be inquired about any possible side effects after using any of the investigated methods. Any temporary or permanent adverse effect will be recorded and documented. Post-operative pain is a minor side effect that can be associated with prolonged mouth opening; it will be managed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants in case of unbearable pain. Audit No formal auditing committee is available. Research Ethics Approval: This protocol and the template informed consent form were reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Scientific Research - Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University, and approved on July 31st, 2023. Approval number 1723. Protocol Amendments: Any modifications to the protocol which may have an impact on the conduct of the study, potential benefit of the patient or may affect patient safety, including changes of study objectives, study design, sample sizes, study procedures, or significant administrative aspects will require a formal amendment to the protocol. Such amendment will be agreed upon by the Council of Fixed Prosthodontics Department. Informed Consent: Principal investigator will introduce the trial to patients and provide full explanation of its aim and benefits in plain language. Patients will then be able to have an informed discussion with the investigator. Investigator will obtain written consent from patients willing to participate in the trial. All consent forms will be translated into Arabic. Confidentiality: All study-related information will be stored securely. All participant information will be stored in locked cloud-based files. All reports, data collection, processes, and administrative forms will be identified by a coded ID \[identification\] number only to maintain participant confidentiality. All records that contain names or other personal identifiers will be stored separately from study records identified by code number. All local databases will be secured with password-protected access systems. Declaration of Interest: No Conflict of interest is currently present. If there will be any conflict of interest it will be declared. Access to Data: The principal investigator and the supervisors will be given access to the data sets. All data sets will be password protected. To ensure confidentiality, data dispersed to project team members will be blinded of any identifying participant information. Post-trial Care: All patients will be followed up for one week after the clinical trial is over. Dissemination Policy: * Study results will be published in an indexed journal (Scopus or Web of Science) as partial fulfillment of the requirements for PhD degree in Fixed Prosthodontics. * Topics suggested for presentation or publication will be circulated to the authors. Biological Specimens: No biological specimens will be collected from the study participants in the proposed study. Statement of Originality: The work contained in this protocol has not been previously submitted for a degree or diplomat in any higher education institution.