This study aims to investigate the best strategy for repeat ablation of recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after previous persistent AF ablation involving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) along. Patients with low voltage areas on the posterer wall will be randomized to PVI alone or the posterer wall isoaltion (PWI) in addition to PVI.
This study aims to find a optmal strategy for repeat ablation for recurrent persistent AF after previous persistent AF ablation involving only PVI. PVI is an evident and well documented target for AF ablation. Many other ablation approaches beyond PVI have been reported. PWI is one of the frequently applied methods. However, this appoach has not been studied in randomized clinical trials for recurrent persistent AF after index procedure, thus evidence is demanded for guidance of clinical practice for AF ablation. The purpose of this study is to clarify this matter by comparing PVI alone strategy with the approach of PVI plus PWI in patients with recurrent persistent AF after index ablation procedure. Since previous clinical studies have shown better outcomes of ablation among patients with normal left atrium (LA) than those with sick LA, ablation strategies in this study will be selected based on voltage mapping of the LA, avoiding unnecessary ablation applications. The investigators hypothesize that PVI is good enough for patients with normal LA (normal voltage ≥0.5 mV); Among patients with low voltage/scar (voltage \< 0.5 mV), PVI plus PWI is superior to PVI alone. This study is a prospective, multi-center, open-labeled, partly randomized study. After enrollment, patients will receive a voltage mapping of the LA which is routine for all AF ablation procedures. Based on the mapping results, patients will be stratified into two strata, normal voltage (≥ 0.5 mV) and low voltage (\< 0.5 mV) in the LA posterior wall. Patients with normal voltage in the LA posterior wall will be directly assigned to arm 1 receiving PVI alone treatment (avoid unnecessary ablation of healthy myocardium). Patients with low voltage will be 1:1 randomized in arms 2 and 3 receiving either PVI alone or PVI + PWI treatment. 1. Arm 1: Normal voltage in LA posterior wall - PVI alone 2. Arm 2: Low voltage in LA posterior wall - PVI alone 3. Arm 3: Low voltage in LA posterior wall - PVI + PWI Three Norwegian University Hospitals, including Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, and University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, will participate in this study. The study is expected to last 3 years, 24 months for enrollment and each patient will be followed for a period of 12 months. In order to minimize bias, subjects will be randomized next to the LA mapping. Patients will be analyzed according to their initial randomization, that is intention-to-treat, even if they never start the treatment, or discontinue, or cross over the group. Patents will be followed in out-patient clinic at 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
Radio frequency ablation
Atrial tachyarrhythmias with duration >30 seconds
Alle episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter of atrial tachycardia) with duration \>30 seconds recorded 3-months after the ablation procedure will be regarded as recurrence. Blanking period is defined as 3 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Complications and adverse events
All periprocedural complications and adverse events during follow-up
Time frame: 12 months
Procedure time
Procedure time will be recorded and reported.
Time frame: During the procedure
Ablation time
Ablation time will be recorded and reported.
Time frame: During the procedure
Fluoroscopy time
Fluoroscopy time will be recorded and reported.
Time frame: During the procedure
Quality of life assessment 1
AF Effect On Quality-Of-Life Questionnaire (AFEQT, scores range 0-100, higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of life assessment 2
Assessed by Short Form (36) Heath Survey (SF-36, scores range 0-100, higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time frame: 12 months
Frequency of atypical atrial flutter
Incidence of atypical atrial flutter will be reported.
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.