This project is a multi-stage evaluation of GenPMTO (Generation Parent Management Training - Oregon Model). GenPMTO is a parenting programme which involves trained practitioners using active teaching approaches (such as group problem-solving, role-play, and video modelling) to support caregivers in using positive parenting strategies at home. The programme is designed to improve parenting practices, as well as a range of outcomes for young people, including improving academic performance, reducing school exclusions, and reducing offending and criminal behaviour. The version of the programme investigated in this project is delivered to groups of parents.
This project represents the first attempt to deliver and evaluate GenPMTO in the UK. To do so, the Ending Youth Violence Lab, at the Behavioural Insights Team, is conducting a multi-stage evaluation, involving delivering the intervention across three London boroughs, with a focus on caregivers of 8-14-year-old children and young people (CYPs), who are identified to have risk factors associated with involvement in violence. To design this project, the Lab has collaborated with two partners. The first is ISII (Implementation Sciences International, Inc.), a research-based, non-profit organisation based in the USA, which implements the GenPMTO programme, in partnership with the programme developers. ISII also trains community practitioners in its use across the world. The second partner is Barnardo's, the UK's largest children's charity, and the delivery partner for the project. This entry refers to the first 2 stages of the project, which will run concurrently: Stage 1 - Adaptation and training * The purpose of this Stage is to prepare for initial delivery and the feasibility testing of delivery, by making any adaptations that may be necessary for the UK context and beginning practitioner training. * The research objectives of this Stage firstly focus on identifying whether the programme may require adaptations to fit into the UK context and identifying and justifying appropriate adaptations. Secondly, the investigators want to identify whether sufficient numbers of practitioners can be recruited and trained within the budget of the project, and to identify the optimal approach to recruitment and training of future practitioner cohorts to allow delivery at a larger scale. Stage 2 - Feasibility study The purpose of this Stage is to understand the feasibility of delivering GenPMTO to the caregivers of children who have been identified as being at risk of violence, through testing recruitment, retention, fidelity, etc. The investigators will also conduct further adaptation to the programme as necessary, responding to what we learn from practitioners and caregivers who have experienced the programme for the first time. The specific research objectives here focus on: * Feasibility - Can Barnardo's recruit and retain caregivers of children who meet inclusion criteria and are at risk of youth violence, and deliver the programme withfidelity? * Acceptability - Is the GenPMTO programme seen as acceptable and valuable by caregivers and practitioners in a UK context? * Evaluability - Firstly, is there sufficient demand and capacity to deliver GenPMTO at a scale required for a randomised control trial? Secondly, is it feasible to collect outcome data from participants, which would support robust outcome data collection procedures during a pilot and/or efficacy trial? This will involve delivering the programme in 3 London boroughs, and collecting a range of survey data and conducting qualitative interviews with caregivers and with practitioners to explore the above questions. The investigators will collect pre- and post-programme outcome data using a range of self-report measures, to explore the potential for future robust evaluation (rather than to assess programme impact).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
36
GenPMTO is a parenting programme which involves trained practitioners using active teaching approaches (such as group problem-solving, role-play, and video modelling) to support caregivers in using positive parenting strategies at home. The programme is designed to improve parenting practices, as well as a range of outcomes for young people, including improving academic performance, reducing school exclusions, and reducing offending and criminal behaviour. The version of the programme investigated in this project is delivered to groups of parents.
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
London, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGLondon Borough of Brent
London, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGLondon Borough of Tower Hamlets
London, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGProportion of practitioners recruited to deliver GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of recruited practitioners, compared to the target.
Time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention
Proportion of practitioners enrolled in training to deliver GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of practitioners enrolled in training, compared to the target.
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Number of referrals received for caregivers to receive GenPMTO
This will involve identifying the total count of referrals received during the feasibility study, as well the mean and standard deviation of monthly referral totals across the feasibility study.
Time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention
Proportion of referred caregivers deemed eligible for GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers deemed eligible for GenPMTO, compared to to the total number of referred caregivers.
Time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention
Proportion of eligible caregivers who are offered GenPMTO who accept this offer (take-up of services)
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who consent to take part in the feasibility study, compared to to the total number of caregivers who are considered eligible to receive and are offered the programme.
Time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention
Retention / drop-out rates of caregivers receiving GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who complete a program, compared to the total number of caregivers who consent to receiving GenPMTO
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Retention / drop-out rates of practitioners delivering GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of practitioners who have completed relevant training and are able to deliver GenPMTO, compared to the total number of practitioners who were enrolled in training.
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Attendance rate at GenPMTO sessions
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who attended each GenPMTO session, compared to the number of caregivers who were expected (i.e. based on caregiver take-up/enrollment) to attend these sessions, as well the mean and standard deviation across the feasibility study.
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Caregivers' perception of the quality of the content and delivery
This will involve calculating the mean and standard deviation of scores, based on a short feedback survey.
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Programme dosage data
This will involve calculating the mean percentage of actual content delivered in GenPMTO sessions to a cohort of caregivers, compared to the amount of planned content to be delivered.
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Ratings of practitioner fidelity
This will involve calculating the mean of practitioners' fidelity scores whilst delivering a full GenPMTO programme. Fidelity is measured using the Fidelity of Implementation (FIMP) Rating System system (expert assessment of videotaped sessions). Each session is assessed on a 9 point scale (1 referring to 'needs work', and 9 referring to 'good work').
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Parenting approach
Parenting Practices Interview (self-reported measure) This is a 64 item measure, with responses measured on a 1-7 Likert scale. Total scores range from 64 to 448, with higher scores indicating improved parenting practices.
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Parental self-efficacy
Parental Locus of Control-Short Form Revised (self-report) This is a 24 item measure, with responses measured on a 1-5 Likert scale. Total scores range from 24 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater parental self-efficacy.
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Behavioural problems
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (parent report of child) The overall (five-subscale) SDQ score ranges from 0 to 50, with a higher score indicating abnormal behaviours. The Total Difficulties score ranges from 0 to 40. The externalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales. The internalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales. Higher scores indicate abnormal behaviours.
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Behavioural problems
Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (parent report of child) 7-point Likert scale, from 1 ('Never Occurs') to 7 ('Always Occurs') and a Yes/No Problem scale. Individual Intensity Score items are summed up, with resultant scores ranging from 36 to 252. For each item, the parents' response regarding whether the behaviour is a problem for them ('Yes' = 1 , 'No' = 0) is also summed to create the Problem Score, ranging from 0 to 36.
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Offending behaviour - Variety
Young people are asked to report on offending behaviours they have participated in. Variety of delinquency score: Sum the number of items the respondent answers 'yes' to: Yes = 1 No = 0 Produces a score that ranges from 0-19, where a higher score indicates a higher variety of delinquency.
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Offending behaviour - Volume
Self-reported delinquency scale (child self-report measure) Young people are asked to report on offending behaviours they have participated in. Volume of delinquency score: Summing the point values when respondents report a number of times. Point values are assigned as follows: Once = 1 Twice = 2 3 times = 3 4 times = 4 5 times = 5 Between 6 and 10 times = 6 More than 10 times = 11 Produces a score that ranges from 0 to 11 for each delinquent behaviour, where a higher score indicates a higher volume of delinquency
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Victimisation
Victimisation sub-scale of the Problem Behaviour Frequency Scale (child self-report measure) Produces a score ranging from 6-36 achieved by summing scores of the two subscales, where a higher score indicates a higher frequency of problem behaviours
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.