This is a multicenter study to test a decision-making support process for families and clinicians facing decisions about chronic home ventilation for a child. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will increase family preparedness for decision-making and will improve clinician-family shared-decision making. Half of families will be assigned to "usual care" arm and half to the "intervention" arm. Intervention families will view the study website with study staff and will answer questions related to website content. All families will be interviewed and surveyed at 1, 6 and 12 months after enrollment. Each family will designate 1-2 physician involved in the decision about home ventilation; each physician will be interviewed and surveyed at 1 month.
Across 4 centers, the investigators will recruit 150 English and/ or Spanish-speaking families (up to 2 parents per family) who are currently facing a decision about tracheostomy and home ventilation for the child. The investigators will also recruit up to 2 clinicians who are central to the decision for each child. The first 50% of families will be assigned to "usual care" arm and the second 50% of families will be assigned to the "intervention" arm. Intervention families will view the study website with study staff and will answer questions related to website content in an interview that could last up to 2 hours. All families will be interviewed at 1, 6 and 12 months after enrollment (each interview lasts 15-30 minutes). Each family will designate 1-2 physician involved in the decision about home ventilation; each physician will be interviewed at 1 month interviews last \~15 minutes). This is a controlled trial of a communication intervention and requires careful attention to words used. The investigators support the intention of being inclusive, and have invested considerable effort in creating a Spanish intervention and diversifying the team to include more native Spanish-speakers. However, as a communication randomized control trial (RCT), the investigators are concerned that one-off efforts to translate the website as well as using a translator, may confound the investigators interpretation of the data. Most significantly, the investigators risk not finding differences between the two arms if the investigators include those who do not speak English or Spanish. Primary endpoints: The investigators hypothesize that, compared to families who receive usual care related to decision-making about pediatric chronic home ventilation, families who receive the HomeVENT intervention will have increased preparedness for decision-making 1 month later. The investigators hypothesize that, compared to families who receive usual care related to decision-making about pediatric chronic home ventilation, families who receive the HomeVENT intervention will perceive increased shared decision-making 1 month later. The investigators hypothesize that, compared to physicians of families who receive usual care related to decision-making about pediatric chronic home ventilation, physicians of families who receive the HomeVENT intervention will perceive increased shared decision-making 1 month later.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
600
Web-based decision support tool that describes diverse family experiences with making decisions about pediatric chronic home ventilation
Johns Hopkins All Childrens Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGChildren's Hospital New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
RECRUITINGJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
RECRUITINGSeattle Childrens Hospital
Seattle, Washington, United States
RECRUITINGPreparedness for Decision Making among parents making decisions about home ventilation as assessed by the Preparedness for Decision Making scale.
The Preparedness for Decision Making scale has a possible score range of 0-100. Higher score means more prepared.
Time frame: 1 month
Shared Decision Making among parents making decisions about home ventilation as assessed by the CollaboRATE-Parent version scale
The CollaboRATE-Parent version scale is a 3 item measure. Score range 0-27. Higher score means better shared decision making.
Time frame: 1 month
Shared Decision Making among parents making decisions about home ventilation as assessed by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS-SDM) survey
The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scale is an 8 item measure. Score range 0-23. Higher score means better shared decision making.
Time frame: 1 month
Shared decision making about home ventilation for physicians as assessed by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - Physician (SDM-Q-DOC) version
The Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - Physician questionnaire is a 9 item measure. Score range 0-54. Higher score meaning better shared decision making.
Time frame: 1 month
Change in decision making regret among parents who chose for or against home ventilation as assessed by the Decision Regret Scale
The Decision Regret Scale is a 5 item scale. Score range 1-25, with higher score meaning more regret.
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
Change in Quality of Life expected vs. actual, among parents who faced choice about home ventilation as assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Family Impact Module (PEDSQL) scale
The Pediatric Quality of Life Family Impact Module (PEDSQL) Score range 0-100. Higher score better quality of life.
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
Change in Impact of decision about home on daily life of child/ family as assessed by a qualitative interview
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.