This study investigates the effectiveness of integrating a cognitive rehabilitation module into a digital psychosocial intervention for recently diagnosed breast cancer patients. The trial involves 176 participants, with one group receiving the ICOnnecta't program (stepped psychosocial intervention) and the other receiving ICOnnecta't with an additional cognitive stepped intervention called ICOgnition. ICOgnition has three levels of intervention including cognitive screening and monitoring, psychoeducation, and online cognitive training. Assessments of the study outcomes will be conducted at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, measuring cognitive functioning, emotional well-being, medication adherence, work functioning, and overall quality of life. The study aims to improve understanding of efficient ways to detect cognitive dysfunction in cancer patients and assess the benefits and feasibility of this early intervention for managing cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients.
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) diagnoses have increased, and while survival rates have improved, the focus on the quality of life (QoL) for survivors, including cognitive function, has intensified. Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is recognized, encompassing objective deficits and subjective experiences. Various factors, such as chemotherapy agents, stress, and psychological factors, influence CRCI. Non-pharmacological treatments, including psychoeducational interventions and cognitive training, have shown promise. However, there are barriers in oncological settings, including a lack of awareness and standardized protocols. Current developed technologies like eHealth offer solutions, yet studies addressing cognitive care in eHealth psychosocial interventions are limited. This study aims to assess the ICOgnition digital intervention's effectiveness in improving BC patients' subjective and objective cognitive symptoms. It also explores factors influencing cognitive function, the effectiveness of online cognitive testing, and the gap between objective and subjective deficits. The study will also evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of ICOnnecta't + ICOgnition interventions to provide insights into their scalability and sustainability. The hypothesis suggests that the ICOnnecta't-enhanced intervention (ICOgnition) will outperform ICOnnecta't alone in improving both subjective and objective cognitive functioning in BC patients. METHODS/DESIGN The trial is conducted at the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) in Hospitalet de Llobregat. Patients meeting inclusion criteria are referred by the Breast Functional Unit to the ICOnnecta't Program team. Eligible candidates receive detailed study information via a call and, if willing to participate, schedule an in-person appointment at the ICOnnecta't Space. Researchers explain the study, obtain informed consent, and utilize the secure web platform REDCap for questionnaires. Assessments occur at baseline (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 12 months (T4). Recruitment starts in December 2023 and spans a year. Breast cancer patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups using REDCap, employing a simple randomization method (1:1). o Study Sample The study will include 176 female breast cancer patients in the acute survival phase from ICO Hospitalet. o Statistical Analysis: Primary Outcome Analysis The study will employ independent Linear Mixed Models with patients clustered to analyze cognitive outcomes between the two intervention groups: digital stepped psychosocial care vs. digital stepped psychosocial care + cognitive module. Subjective Cognition (FACT-Cog) and Objective Cognition (Neurocognitive Index) will be separately assessed, adjusting for age and education. Descriptive statistics, effect sizes, and 95% confidence intervals will be reported. Secondary Outcome Analysis Linear Mixed Models will be used to analyze secondary outcomes (e.g., depression, anxiety, distress, quality of life) following the same procedure. Mediation analysis will explore emotional distress and posttraumatic stress as mediators between interventions and cognitive responses. Other Pre-Specified Outcome Analyses * Discrepancy between Objective and Subjective Measures: Standardized values will be compared using ICC, Bland-Altman Plot, and linear regression to identify variables explaining discrepancies. * Clusters of Cognitive Impairment: Cluster analysis will identify participant groups with similar cognitive profiles and explore differences in demographics, clinical variables, and treatment response. * Cognitive Assessment Optimization: The equivalence of online vs. paper and pencil tests in detecting cognitive impairment will be tested, and the most sensitive test for CRCI detection will be explored. * Cost-Utility Analysis: This analysis expresses the cost-effectiveness of interventions in terms of cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained, a common measure used in healthcare decision-making. * Statistical Power: Utilizing GLIPMPSE, the study has a power of 0.802 with a significance level of 0.05. With 176 subjects (88 in each group), the study can detect a significant difference of 5.9 units, assuming a common standard deviation of 15, based on previous research findings (Bell et al., 2018). o Discussion The ICOgnition intervention offers a promising and comprehensive approach to address cognitive difficulties in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. By integrating digital psychosocial support, personalized cognitive training, and psychoeducational resources, this intervention aims to enhance cognitive function and improve the overall quality of life for patients. Notably, its potential impact could extend to individuals facing cognitive challenges in various medical conditions beyond breast cancer. However, challenges related to implementation, resource allocation, patient adherence, and economic evaluation need careful consideration to ensure the intervention's effectiveness in real-world settings. If successfully implemented, ICOgnition could serve as a valuable model for addressing cognitive impairments, fostering a better understanding of cognitive challenges in medical settings, and enhancing patients' overall well-being.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
176
The ICOgnition intervention for breast cancer patients consists of three levels: Level 1: Monthly assessments using FACT-Cog PCI and Cognifit. Scores \<54 (PCI) or ≤250 (Cognifit) escalate to Level 2. Level 2: Specialized content includes Cognitive Psychoeducation, validating experiences and improving health literacy; Behavioral Guidance, offering practical strategies for daily tasks; and Embracing Cognitive Deficits, promoting self-compassion and acceptance through mindfulness and metaphors. Level 3: Online cognitive training focuses on enhancing cognitive skills through gaming exercises, completing the comprehensive intervention approach.
Change in Subjective cognition
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function, FACT-Cog, Perceived Cognitive Impairment sub-scale (PCI), developed specifically to assess cognitive difficulties in cancer patients (https://www.facit.org/measures/FACT-Cog) is used. Lower scores (0-72) indicate a poor perceived performance.
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Change in Objective Cognition (Digital assessment)
The objective cognitive assessment will be provided by the licensed computer program CogniFit Inc © 2023. CogniFit offers a specific cognitive assessment called "Chemfog," which measures 6 cognitive domains: planning, processing speed, short-term memory, focus attention, coordination and spatial perception. Lower scores (0-800) indicate poor objective performance in those domains.
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 12 months
Change in Objective Cognition (Paper and pencil assessment)
Verbal Learning, Immediate Verbal Memory and Delayed Verbal Memory will be measured through RAVLT - Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. The executive functions domains that will be measured are cognitive flexibility through Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) \[50\], verbal fluency through its Spanish version and working memory through Digit Span backward of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS-IV). Attention will be measured via TMT-A and Digit Span forward (WAIS-IV). Finally, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST; WAIS-IV) will be used to measure processing speed.
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 12 months
Change in emotional distress
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to assess emotional distress through 7 anxiety items (HADS-Anxiety) and 7 depression items (HADS-Depression). The range of scores is 0-21 for each subscale, and 0-42 for the overall questionnaire, where higher scores indicate worse clinical symptoms
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Change in Medication adherence
Medication adherence will be assessed through the Spanish version of Adherence to Refill and Medication Scale (ARMS-e), which is a valid and reliable scale for patients with chronic disease. This instrument consists of 12 questions: 8 are focused on the patient's consistency in taking medication appropriately and 4 on their proper collection. Lower overall scores correspond to better adherence.
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Change in Quality of Life
The European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D- 3L) provides a measure of Health-Related QoL (HRQoL) and is helpful for the evaluation of the cost-utility of health interventions. Lower scores represent worst health status.
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 12 months
Post-traumatic Stress
The Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) is widely used in clinical and research settings to screen for post-traumatic symptoms. Higher scores indicate a higher severity of post-traumatic symptoms
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 12 months
Changes in Work role functioning
Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (WRFQ): a self-report assessment tool, validated in cancer patients and in Spanish population, that is used to evaluate an individual's work-related functioning and productivity. It is specifically designed to measure how mental health symptoms and conditions impact an individual's ability to perform in a work environment. Higher scores indicate better work-related functioning.
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 12 months
Changes in Health Literacy
Health literacy will be measured with a visual analogue scale with the following question (translated from Spanish): "Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the information provided to you by the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) regarding your illness and treatments, where 0 is very dissatisfied with the information received, and 10 is very satisfied with the information received ".
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at baseline and at 12 months
Intervention Satisfaction
Intervention Satisfaction will be measured with a visual analogue scale with the following question (translated from Spanish): "Rate from 0 to 10 to what extent you are satisfied with the ICOnnecta't/ICognition Intervention, where 0 is completely dissatisfied and 10 is completely satisfied".
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at 3 months
ICOnnecta't / ICOgnition App Usability
App Usability will be measured with a visual analogue scale with the following question (translated from Spanish): "Rate from 0 to 10 to what extent you found the application easy to use, where 0 is very difficult to use and 10 is very easy to use"
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted at 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.