In acute dyspnea, the use of chest radiography is frequent and not very contributive, especially in the elderly patients. However, early diagnosis of the cause of dyspnea in the ED is associated with a better prognosis, in particular for the identification of an infectious or cardiac origin. Chest CT has already shown better diagnostic performances than conventional radiography in several pathologies such as low respiratory infection, and the development of so-called "low dose" scans allows to limit the irradiation during this examination. The investigators aim to conduct a diagnostic study comparing non-injected chest CT-scan and conventional chest radiography in patients older than 65 presenting in the ED with acute dyspnea to assess whether CT-scan improves diagnosis.
Patients of 65 years and older presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnea and for whom a chest radiography is mandatory will be screened for inclusion. If the inclusion criteria are met and in the absence of non-inclusion criteria, free and informed oral consent will be sought. Once the patient is included, management by the emergency physician will be routine. A non-injected chest CT scan will be requested to the emergency radiology department in addition to the chest radiography. As a result, an X-ray and then a CT scan will be performed in each patient. 3 diagnoses will be collected: 1. By the emergency physician in charge of the patient, after the chest X-ray and before the CT scan (DiagU1) 2. By the emergency physician in charge of the patient, after the results of the scan (DiagU2) 3. By an adjudication committee after review of the medical file (DiagExpert) A comparison will be made between the 3 diagnoses.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
240
A CT scan will be requested for every patient in addition to the chest X-ray
Emergency department Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, France
Improved diagnosis
Proportion of patients with "bad diagnosis" before scanning and "good diagnosis" after scanning (according to adjudication committee)
Time frame: 28 days after inclusion
Discordant diagnosis
Proportion of patients with discordant pre- and post-scan diagnoses
Time frame: 28 days after inclusion
Improvement in diagnostic certainty
Difference in "Diagnostic certainty" in percentage by self-assessment before and after scan
Time frame: 28 days after inclusion
Scans performed
Proportion of patients for whom the scan was actually performed
Time frame: baseline (Day 0)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.