The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The trial aim to evaluate : * Efficacy of ARMA comparing with medical treatment alone (proton pump inhibitor (PPI)), using GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD- HRQL questionnaire), improvement of acid exposure time and DeMeester score * Safety and complications of ARMA Participants will be randomly divided into 2 groups. The intervention group will be undergone ARMA, and the control group will be undergone sham endoscopic treatment. The primary endpoint will be symptoms relief (GERD-HRQL decreases \> 50%). The secondary endpoint will be dosage adjustment of PPI, complications, improvement of acid exposure time and DeMeester score.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
68
Patients are instructed to fast for 6 hours pre-procedurally, which are performed under intravenous propofol sedation. Retroflexion endoscopy to visualize the cardia is performed, followed by mucosa markings with straight-fire APC catheter (ERBE Electromedizin, Tübingen, Germany) in forced coagulation mode (VIO300D, ERBE Electromedizin, Tübingen, Germany, 20W). The marking site at 1-cm and 2-cm distal to squamocolumnar junction at anterior-posterior and lesser curvature site, respectively, sparing the greater curvature site of cardia, is done. After marking, mucosal ablation (forced coagulation mode, 1L/min, 80W) is performed at marking site in a hoarse-shoe shape. Adequate ablation depth is defined as reaching the submucosal layer with blackish discolored tissue with carbonization
Patients are instructed to fast for 6 hours pre-procedurally, which are performed under intravenous propofol sedation. Retroflexion endoscopy to visualize the cardia is performed. Using the straight-fire APC catheter to touch the marking sites similar to the treatment group without electrocauterization is performed.
Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms
Clinical success is defined as more than 50% improvement of the GERD-HRQL questionnaire at 3 months after the ARMA procedure. The results are from minimal 0 points up to 50 points. The higher the points, the greater the symptoms.
Time frame: 3 months
Complication rate
Recording of all complications related to the ARMA procedure
Time frame: 12 months
PPI dependency
Requirement and dose of PPI at 3, 6 and 12 months after ARMA
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in acid exposure time
Changes in acid exposure time in 24 pH meter at 3 and 12 months after ARMA
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in DeMeester score
Changes in DeMeester score in 24 pH meter at 3 and 12 months after ARMA. A DeMeester score of ≤ 14.72 is considered physiological.
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in lower esophageal sphincter pressure
Changes in lower esophageal sphincter pressure in high resolution manometry at 3 and 12 months after ARMA
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.