Efficacy of Air-polishing on Pain Perception and Compliance Rate

Overview

Implants have become a popular and widely used treatment option for treating partial and total edentulism. As the number of implants placed increases, so does the incidence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Placing patients under SPT/maintenance care has been shown to prevent and treat such conditions. Despite SPT's importance in prevention and infection control, adherence to scheduled SPT visits have been unsatisfactory. Understanding the reasons for non-compliance can help both the clinician and research community to address them by improving patients experience to those visits thereby increasing compliance.

Objectives: 1. General objective Evaluate the patient reported outcomes to a different implant instrumentation method during SPT visits, as well as its effect in compliance rates and clinical outcomes. 2. Specific objective 1. To evaluate pain/discomfort during SPT around dental implants and teeth. 2. To evaluate pain/discomfort during SPT around healthy and diseased dental implants. 3. To evaluate patient reported outcomes and clinical variables by decontamination during SPT with erythritol based air polishing powder (Air Flow Master, Air-Flow Plus, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland), at the first SPT, at 1 and 2 years. 4. To evaluate the effect of erythritol based air polishing powder (Air Flow Master, Air-Flow Plus, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) during SPT on the compliance rates after 1 and 2 years of follow-up. 5. Hypothesis: a) General Hypothesis The proposed protocols, focused on the prevention of peri-implantitis, will result in an increase adherence to SPT by better understanding the specific factors related to non-compliance, specifically by improving the experience of patients to SPT visits. b) Specific Hypothesis 1. SPT with conventional ultrasonic device will result in more pain/discomfort around dental implants than in teeth. 2. SPT by means of an erythritol based air-polishing powder (Air Flow Master, Air-Flow Plus, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) will result in better patient reported outcomes and same clinical outcomes, at the first SPT and after 2 years. 3. SPT by means of an erythritol based air-polishing powder (Air Flow Master, Air-Flow Plus, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) will result in the increase of the compliance rates after 2 year of follow-up. 6\. Material y Methods: Study Design The present research project is designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up. The reporting of this clinical trial will follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting (CONSORT) guidelines. Subject Selection The study will be performed after the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC) and will be conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and Ethical Conduct for Research with Human Beings. A list of patients who have been enrolled in SPT at the Department of Periodontology of UIC and met the inclusion criteria will be used - patients will be called once every 2 days (with a maximum of 3 attempts) for a SPT visit by the same investigator (E.R). \- SPT visit One calibrated investigator will consecutively call patients for SPT visits and will be responsible of enrolling the patients (E.R). The study variables will be recorded in a case report form (CRF) specially designed for the study. Each study patient will be assigned a numerical code comprising a 3-digit patient code (assigned correlatively as they are included in the study). Only the study investigator will be able to identify the patient by their code. Screening examination The clinician will review with the patient the Information and Medication History Forms and record the anthropometric, socio-demographic and clinical information. Candidates will undergo an oral pathology examination and a full-mouth manual probing using a periodontal probe PCP-UNC 15 (HuFriedy, Rockwell St, Chicago, IL) to determine their periodontal and peri-implant status. Presence or absence of plaque will be recorded after staining with an erythrosine disclosing dye (Plac-Control®, Dentaid SL, Cerdanyola, Spain). Finally, periapical radiographs (Dürr Dental AG, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) of all implants will be taken using a paralleling cone technique and a film-holder (7mA- 60kV/20ms). The same calibrated examiner (E.R) will record clinical variables of mPI, BOP, PPD, MR and clinical attachment level (CAL). Randomization and study groups Once oral hygiene instructions were provided, patients will be randomly assigned to the Test or Control groups. Allocation of patients will be decided following randomization tables with permuted blocks of four while the information will be concealed by using opaque envelopes, which will be labelled with the patient study number and only be revealed after oral hygiene instructions are provided. Questionnaires A blinded calibrated examiner (C.V) will give each patient the following questionnaires. Pain Perception Pain experienced during the SPT visit will be recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A horizontal 10 cm VAS (graded from zero, representing no pain, to 10, representing the worst pain possible) will be used by the patients immediately after finishing the supragingival debridement around teeth, and then, after performing supragingival debridement around the dental implants. Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) Another questionnaire (MDAS) will be used to measure patient anxiety towards SPT visit in both groups. The MDAS consists of five questions answered with a 5-category Likert scale, ranging from 'not anxious' to 'extremely anxious'. The original MDAS questionnaire does not cover anxiety toward SPT visits. Therefore, a question enquiring about patients' feelings toward SPT visit will be added. Patients will complete the modified MDAS once, after finishing the SPT visit. \- Follow-up SPT visits Patients enrolled in the study will be called for SPT every 4 months (to standardize every patient during the time of the study) and supragingival debridement will be performed accordingly to their group (control or test). All clinical and microbiological variables will be re-examined by the same blinded examiner (E.R) after the first SPT visit (4 months), at 1 year and 2 years of follow-up. Additionally, a periapical radiograph of all implants involved in the study will be taken at 1 year and 2 years of follow-up. Individual compliance will be registered as well in the CRF. Patients will be further motivated with respect to oral hygiene habits during the entire period of the study. Clinical examination A guidebook will be prepared to standardize procedures throughout the protocol, step by step, for all questionnaires and evidence collection. The data will be transferred to a computerized database. The study variables will be recorded in a case report form (CRF) specially designed for the study. Each study patient will be assigned a numerical code comprising a 3-digit patient code (assigned correlatively as they are included in the study). Only the study investigator will be able to identify the patient by their code. Determination of recurrent sites and re-treatment needs Sites will be determined as re-treatment needs if they show PD ≥ 4 mm and CAL ≥ 4 mm in more than 2 non-adjacent teeth, together with the presence ≥10% of BOP and/or SU (around teeth) and if they show PD ≥ 6mm, together with BOP and/or SU, and bone levels ≥3 mm apical of the most coronal portion of the intraosseous part of the implant (around dental implants), during SPT appointment. Individuals will be treated with non-surgical or surgical procedures, where necessary, by postgraduate students of the Periodontology Department at the CUO (UIC). Intra-examiner reproducibility Reproducibility of clinical examinations will be conducted by the examiner (E.R), evaluating the Implant PPD and mBI in 5 patients, not involved in the study, on two separate occasions, 1 week apart. The intra-class correlation coefficient and the kappa index will be calculated. Calibration will be accepted when measurements at baseline and at one-week evaluation will be within a difference of 0.5 mm \>90% of the time. Withdrawal of consent The Patient Information Sheet will clearly state that the patient can withdraw from the study at any time without prejudice or explanation. Such withdrawal will be documented in the medical record file. Losses to follow-up are taken into account in the sample size calculations (12%). Statistical analysis Descriptive analysis Descriptive statistical methods (percentage and numbers on total) will be used to analyze the evaluated parameter Inferential analysis Data will be calculated at patient level and implant/tooth level. VAS score will be considered as the main outcome (quantitative). If the distribution is normal, the following tests will be used: * Binary categorical variables: T-Student / Fisher's exact test; * Categorical variables with \> 2 categories: ANOVA; * Quantitative variables: Simple linear regression / Pearson correlation coefficient. If it doesn't follow normality: * Binary categorical variables: U of Mann-Whitney; * Categorical variables\> 2 categories: H of Kruskal-Wallis;