A study on the intent to use a tool (MuSt-PC) to manage symptoms of patients in a palliative care trajectory.
A survey study will be conducted to evaluate if GHCPs have the Intention to Use (IU) MuSt- PC in daily practice. GHCPs are recruited via the connections of the seven Centers of Expertise in Palliative Care. To invite them to participate in the study, the GHCPs are approached directly via e-mail or telephone. Participating GHCPs will be educated on how to use MuSt-PC (educational materials and instruction webinar). GHCPs will be asked to use the CDSS for five individual patients. Every time after using MuSt-PC they will be asked to answer additional questions about their experience with using MuSt-PC in that specific instance. After using MuSt-PC for five patients, they are requested to fill out a comprehensive questionnaire about their overall experiences with using the CDSS.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
70
A survey study will be conducted to evaluate if GHCPs have the Intention to Use (IU) MuSt-PC in daily practice.
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
LUMC
Leiden, Netherlands
Questions evaluating Intention to Use (IU)
Questions evaluating Intention to Use (IU) (7-point Likert scales)
Time frame: after 5 times use of the MuSt-PC tool within 3 months
Questions evaluating other modified TAM domains
Questions evaluating other modified TAM domains: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease-of-Use, Attitude, Compatibility, Subjective norm, Facilitators, Habit (7-point Likert Scales).
Time frame: after 5 times use of the MuSt-PC tool within 3 months
Perceived benefits and disadvantages of using MuSt-PC
Perceived benefits and disadvantages of using MuSt-PC (open-ended questions).
Time frame: after 5 times use within 3 months
Suggestions to improve the MuSt-PC CDSS
Suggestions to improve the MuSt-PC CDSS (open-ended question).
Time frame: after 5 times of the MuSt-PC tool within 3 months
An overview of the content of questions of participating GHCPs regarding MuSt-PC use.
An overview of the content of questions of participating GHCPs regarding MuSt-PC use. Questions will be analyzed qualitatively; coding will be done independently by two researchers. In case of disagreement, consensus will be achieved through discussion. Coding will result in categorization of question subject. Categorizations are ranked from most prevalent to least prevalent question subject (proportion of respondents).
Time frame: after 5 times use within 3 months
Most useful elements of MuSt-PC will be evaluated with a multiple-choice question.
Most useful elements of MuSt-PC will be evaluated with a multiple-choice question. (multiple answers allowed) Frequency and percentage of total respondents who chose the multiple choice answer possibilities will be evaluated
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: after 5 times use within 3 months
Mean scores of HCPs adherence to CDSS recommendations
Mean scores (5-point Likert scale) of HCPs adherence to CDSS recommendations (each time using MuSt-PC)
Time frame: after 5 times use of the MuSt-PC tool within 3 months