The aim of the study is to compare the anesthetic efficacy and need for supplemental anesthesia of 1.8 ml compared to 3.6 ml of 4% articaine buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Patients with moderate-to-severe pain due to symptomatic irreversible pulpitis will be included. Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups to receive either 1.8 ml 4% articaine buccal infiltration or 3.6. ml 4% articaine buccal infiltration before single visit root canal treatments. Intraoperative pain will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) so that anesthetic success will be defined as no to mild intraoperative pain. The need for supplemental anesthesia will also be recorded.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
70
3.6 ml 4% articaine buccal infiltration
1.8 ml 4% articaine buccal infiltration
Anesthetic success
Will be measured by 11-point numerical rating scale NRS. The success will be defined as no or mild pain (NRS 0 or less than 3) and the failure will be defined as moderate to severe pain (NRS more than 3).
Time frame: During the procedure
Need for supplemental anesthesia
Whether the patient requires supplemental anesthesia or not. It will be recorded by the questionnaire (yes or no).
Time frame: During the procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.