This study seeks to develop the evidence for a sustainable, community-partnered, multi-level health system strategy to improve blood pressure control. Two team-based approaches are being tested: 1) a medical model of remote BP management (RBPM) alone, and 2) RBPM plus a social model with a community health worker (CHW). These 2 strategies are being compared with a standard community screening program with referral to primary care.
In this comparative effectiveness trial, we aim to answer the research question of whether a remote blood pressure management program (RBPM, inclusive of home blood pressure monitoring and telehealth visits with a nurse or pharmacist delivering protocol-supported BP management, inclusive of medications and lifestyle modifications) alone or an RBPM program with community health worker (CHW) support is more effective than standard screening with education and referral to primary care in controlling blood pressure and addressing social determinants that lead to poor health outcomes. This is a multisite study using a stepped wedge design. Health systems in 4 different cities are each partnered with 10 community based organizations (CBOs). CBOs are randomized into one of 4 sequences. Each sequence moves through the 3 study arms at different time points: Community Standard, RBPM alone, and RBPM+CHW. At the CBOs, research health advocates screen for hypertension. Qualifying individuals who provide informed consent can enroll in the study and are assigned to the intervention that the CBO is in at that particular time. All participants receive a blood pressure cuff and a device that syncs their data with the research database. If enrolled in the RBPM arm, participants are scheduled for telehealth visits with the Pressure Check medical team to improve blood pressure control through lifestyle support and medication initiation/titration. If enrolled in the RBPM+CHW arm, participants additionally receive support from a CHW to help with medical visits and address social determinants of health. The primary outcome is blood pressure control at 6 months. Additional outcomes include implementation science to understand factors associated with adoption and outcomes, and 12 and 18 month blood pressure control. In partnering with the community, health systems can extend their reach. CBO leaders support health messaging around hypertension and increase trust between the health system and their clients (patients). The two models, RBPM alone and RBPM+CHW, are based on the concept that disparities in hypertension control among Black, Latinx, and low-income populations exist because of inequities related to health system access and trust, individual-level socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, the physical/built environment, sociocultural factors, and discriminatory policies. Addressing these barriers may improve blood pressure control.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,440
Participants will receive the additional support of a Community Health Worker (CHW); specific activities include: support with home BP monitoring, reminders to attend RBPM clinical visits, and support with social issues impacting health (e.g., food insecurity; transportation; housing instability).
Participants will receive a medical model of remote BP management (RBPM). Care is guided by protocols based on ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guidelines. This may include medications and/or lifestyle modifications, as is clinically indicated and personalized to each participant using principles of shared decision making.
Yale
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
RECRUITINGMassachusetts General Brigham Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHouston Methodist
Houston, Texas, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGBlood Pressure Control
Participants will be assessed at 6 months for Blood Pressure (BP) control- defined as BP \<130/80 mmHg. To assess BP control, blood pressure will be measured in-person at the CBO (or another location) at Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months with the primary endpoint of assessment as BP control at 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
Difference in systolic BP between study groups, measured at CBO
Mean difference in BP measured at CBO at baseline and follow-up; take average of last 2 of 3 measurements
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Difference in BP control by study group, measured at CBO
Proportion of participants with BP with: Ideal \<120/80 mmHg Intermediate: \<=135/85 mmHg Poor: \>135/85mmHg
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Change in Well-being
Well-being is assessed with the 12-item 100 Million Healthier Lives. Cantrill's Ladder: stratification into Thriving, Suffering, Struggling. Will assess mean differences of 0.5 as meaningfully different
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Change in Lifestyle behaviors
Differences in self-reported measures using a survey.Each measure is categorized as "ideal"(2 points), "intermediate"(1 point) or "poor" (0 point).
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Sentara Health
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
RECRUITING