This project intends to carry out a multi-center retrospective observational real-world study to understand the current status of amphotericin B use by formulation type, compare the differences in safety and efficacy of each formulation in domestic clinical application, provide real-world evidence for clinical drug selection, and provide evidence-based evidence in support of rational clinical drug use.
The researchers selected patients with amphotericin B use records discharged from five tertiary hospitals across the country from January 1, 2020 to the present, extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and divided them into experimental and control groups, in order to understand the current status of amphotericin B use in each preparation type, compare the differences in the safety and efficacy of the various preparations in the domestic clinical application, and provide real-world evidence of the choice of clinical medication.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
184
Rui Yang,MD
Jinan, Shandong, China
Overall Adverse Reaction Rate
The incidence of total adverse reactions was analyzed to assess the difference in safety of amphotericin B by formulation type in domestic clinical application, to provide real-world evidence for clinical drug selection, and to provide evidence-based evidence in support of rational clinical drug use.
Time frame: Through study completion,up to half a year.
Pathogen clearance rate
To assess the differences in effectiveness of amphotericin B by formulation type in domestic clinical application by analyzing the pathogen clearance rate, to provide real-world evidence for clinical dosing selection, and to provide evidence-based evidence to support rational clinical dosing.
Time frame: Through study completion,up to half a year.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.