This will be a pivotal prospective prospective, international, multi-center, comparative, randomized, cross-over, open-label lymphoma diagnostic trial to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent \[68Ga\]Ga-PTF) , versus \[18F\]FDG PET/CT imaging, for staging of patients with confirmed marginal zone lymphoma exemplary for CXCR4-positive malignant lymphomas.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
8
\[68Ga\]Ga-PTF i.v. injection
\[18F\]FDG i.v. injection.
Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
CHU La Timone
Marseille, France
Sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-PTF PET/CT imaging vs. [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging in tumor detection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Specificity of [68Ga]Ga-PTF PET/CT imaging vs. [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging in tumor detection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF and [18F]FDG) compared to pre-PET conventional staging as assessed by questionnaires completed by the referring physicians
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with a change in intended patient management due to additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF and [18F]FDG) as assessed by questionnaires completed by the referring physicians
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF and [18F]FDG) compared to pre-PET conventional staging as assessed by questionnaires completed by an Independent Committee
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Inter-observer agreement of local and central assessment in terms of staging
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with nodal MZL with additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF and [18F]FDG) compared to pre-PET conventional staging as assessed by questionnaires completed by the referring physicians
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, France
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Essen, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, Germany
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Bologna, Italy
L'IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" - IRST S.r.l
Meldola, Italy
Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.l.
Milan, Italy
...and 2 more locations
Proportion of patients with extranodal MZL with additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF and [18F]FDG) compared to pre-PET conventional staging as assessed by questionnaires completed by the referring physicians
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with splenic MZL with additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF and [18F]FDG) compared to pre-PET conventional staging as assessed by questionnaires completed by the referring physicians
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with nodal MZL with a change in intended patient management due to additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF and [18F]FDG) as assessed by questionnaires completed by the referring physicians
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with extranodal MZL with a change in intended patient management due to additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF;[18F]FDG) as assessed by questionnaires completed by the referring physicians
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with splenic MZL with a change in intended patient management due to additional or less lesions detected by each PET/CT imaging agent ([68Ga]Ga-PTF and [18F]FDG) as assessed by questionnaires completed by the referring physicians
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Diagnostic performance, consisting of sensitivity and specificity, of each PET/CT imaging agent in tumor detection on a region-basis (eyes, ears, nose, throat, liver, spleen, gastrointestinal tract, bone marrow) confirmed by SoT or surrogate SoT
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Sensitivity of each PET/CT imaging agent in tumor detection on a patient-basis confirmed by SoT or surrogate SoT
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of each PET/CT imaging agent to detect tumor on a patient-basis and lesion-basis
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Detection rate of each PET/CT imaging agent to detect tumor on a patient-basis and lesion-basis confirmed by SoT or surrogate SoT
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of patients with additional or less tumoral lesions detected by [68Ga]Ga-PTF PET/CT imaging compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Inter-reader and intra-reader agreement for tumor detection of each PET/CT imaging agent on a lesion-basis and patient-basis
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Reproducibility of [68Ga]Ga-PTF PET/CT imaging (reproducibility group)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVpeak and SUV mean of each PET/CT imaging agent
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Target-to-background ratio (TBR) of each PET/CT imaging agent
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of each PET/CT imaging agent
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Signal-to-noise ratio (CNR) of each PET/CT imaging agent
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events for each PET/CT imaging agent
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
Frequency and kind of adverse effects present at the injection site
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of the injection site status (which kind of adverse effects have appeared) after the injection of each PET/CT imaging compound
Time frame: 2-3 hours after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
Clinical significance of abnormal results during physical examination
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of physical examination findings
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic)
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic)
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
Heart or pulse rate
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of heart or pulse rate
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
RR interval findings/abnormalities
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of findings/abnormalities in the RR interval
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
PQ interval findings/abnormalities
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of PQ interval findings/abnormalities
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
QRS complex findings/abnormalities
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of QRS complex findings/abnormalities
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
QT interval findings/abnormalities
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of QT interval findings/abnormalities
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
QTc interval findings/abnormalities
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of QTc interval findings/abnormalities
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent
Weight
The safety and tolerability for each PET/CT imaging agent will be evaluated by the assessment of patient weight
Time frame: Prior injection of each PET/CT imaging agent and after injection of each PET/CT imaging agent