This is a two-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of early left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy and guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with mild-reduced ejection fraction.
Early-resync is a two-center, prospective randomized controlled trial that is designed to determine whether early left bundle branch pacing has a better impact on LV function improvement as compared with traditional guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with mild-reduced ejection fraction(36%≤LVEF≤50%) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). Patients with symptomatic heart failure,36%≤LVEF≤50%, NYHA function class II-IV, and CLBBB(according to STRAUSS criteria) will be 1:1 randomized to LBBP+GDMT or GDMT group after enrollment and be followed at 3 and 6 months after randomization. LBBP will be performed by a double-chamber device in LBBP+GDMT group. All patients will receive GDMT. The primary endpoint is the change in the LVEF at 6 months after randomization from baseline.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
36
LBBP is a procedure that the pacing lead is placed at the left bundle branch to achieve electrical and mechanical synchronization by pacing the left bundle branch area with stable pacing parameters.
GDMT is defined as the drug strategy for treatment of heart failure according to the current guidelines.
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
The first affiliated hospital of Nanjing medical university
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
ΔLVEF between baseline and 6-month follow-up
ΔLVEF:change in LVEF in percentage (%) between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
ΔLVEDD and ΔLVESV between baseline and 6-month follow-up
ΔLVEDD:change in LVEDD in millimeters between baseline and 6-month follow-up between two groups. ΔLVESV:change in LVESV in milliliters between baseline and 6-month follow-up between two groups.
Time frame: 6 months
The echocardiographic response rate of LVEF ≥50%
the percentage of patients with LVEF ≥50% at 6 month follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
The changes of NYHA function class between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
NYHA function class (from I to IV) is evaluated by clinicians at each outpatient follow-up visit;
Time frame: 6 months
Composite incidence rate of all-cause mortality and/or hospitalization for heart failure
All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy.
Time frame: 6 months
The rate of LVEF <=35% at six-month
The percentage of patients with LVEF \<=35% at 6 month follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
The changes of NT-proBNP between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
NT-proBNP in pg/ml was measured by performing a blood test;
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 6 months
The changes of 6MWD between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
6MWD in meters stands for "6-Minute Walk Distance." It is a common test used to assess a person's functional exercise capacity and cardiovascular endurance. During the test, the patient is asked to walk as far as possible within a span of 6 minutes in a straight path or designated walking course;
Time frame: 6 months
The changes of QoL between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
QoL stands for "Quality of Life", which is measured by The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). The MLHFQ is a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire for patients with HF, comprising 21 items from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst HRQoL).
Time frame: 6 months