Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) and unloading ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) have shown varying levels of success in reducing forces acting on different regions of the bottom of the foot during gait. CDOs and unloading AFOs have shown differing offloading capabilities across different regions of the foots (hindfoot, midfoot, forefoot) which may be related to a distinct difference between CDOs and unloading AFOs: CDOs do not suspend, or distract, the foot away from the footplate. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of CDOs and heel distraction height (the distance between the heel and the footplate) on limb loading and motion during gait as well as patient reported pain, and comfort.
Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) have been used to improve function, reduce pain, and offload the foot and ankle for individuals with a number of conditions affecting the lower extremity. CDOs consist of a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that bends to store and return energy during mid to late stance, a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, and, in some cases, a foam heel wedge placed in the shoe. Unloading ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) have also been used for a number of lower extremity conditions, including traumatic injuries, in effort to reduce forces and pressure acting under the foot. Unloading AFOs have been created using many different designs, which include a proximal cuff just below the knee, a rigid strut (made of metal, plastic, etc.), and some sort of foot component (footplate, shoe, etc.). Both CDOs and unloading AFOs have shown varying levels of success in reducing forces acting on different regions of the bottom of the foot during gait. The differences in loading may be related to a distinct difference between CDOs and unloading AFOs: CDOs do not suspend, or distract, the foot away from the footplate. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of CDOs and heel distraction height (the distance between the heel and the footplate) on limb loading and motion as well as patient reported pain and comfort. In this study, forces acting under the foot will be measured using wireless Loadsol insoles (Novel GMBH, St. Paul, MN) as participants walk without an orthosis (NoCDO) and with a CDO with three different posterior strut lengths resulting in three different levels of heel distraction (0cm, 1cm, 2cm) at self-selected and controlled speeds. Additionally, gait kinematic and kinetics will be measured using infrared motion capture cameras (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., Denver, CO) and force plates (AMTI, Watertown, MA). Participants will be provided a lift for the contralateral limb to reduce the effects of leg length discrepancies during walking. Loadpad force measuring sensors (Novel GMBH, St. Paul, MN) will be used to measure forces within the CDO proximal cuff. After walking in each condition, participants will complete questionnaires concerning pain and orthosis comfort.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
20
The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) used in this study will consist of a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, a carbon fiber posterior strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee. The CDO will be modular in design which will allow three carbon fiber struts of the same stiffness and differing lengths to be used to implement 0cm, 1cm, and 2cm levels of heel distraction height. A longer posterior strut will move the carbon fiber footplate away from the participants foot to create the heel distraction height.
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
RECRUITINGPeak Force (forefoot)
Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.
Time frame: Baseline
Force Impulse (forefoot)
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Force (hindfoot)
Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the hindfoot (proximal 30% sensor) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.
Time frame: Baseline
Force Impulse (hindfoot)
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the hindfoot (proximal 30% sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.
Time frame: Baseline
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable
Time frame: Baseline
Modified Socket Comfort Score
Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable, and from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Force (total foot)
Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the total foot (100% of sensors) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.
Time frame: Baseline
Force Impulse (total foot)
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (100% of sensors) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Force (midfoot)
Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.
Time frame: Baseline
Force Impulse (midfoot)
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.
Time frame: Baseline
Ankle Range of Motion
Peak ankle dorsiflexion (degrees) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Ankle Moment
Peak ankle plantarflexion moment (Nm/kg) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Ankle Power
Peak ankle push-off power (W/kg) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.