The study will investigate whether a novel method to accurately count epileptic seizures, using a CE-marked minimally-invasive ultra long-term subcutaneous electroencephalography (EEG) solution (UNEEG™ SubQ , including 24/7 EEG SubQ), (i) is more accurate than a participant-reported seizure diary; (ii) is feasible and acceptable to participants and clinicians; (iii) reduces impacts of epilepsy and improves quality-of-life; and (iv) provides gains to the healthcare system when rolled-out into the National Health Service (NHS). 33 participants with drug-resistant epilepsy will be implanted with the UNEEG™ SubQ device and will collect data for six months. Annotated seizures from the EEG data will be sent weekly to the treating clinicians, who will communicate with the participants on a monthly basis, and will be free to make any management changes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
33
2-channel subcutaneous EEG device
King's College London
London, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGDiagnostic accuracy of rapid data review of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution
Within-participant correlation between seizure counts per month estimated from rapid review of annotated 24/7 EEG™ SubQ data and 'ground truth' EEG seizure occurrences per month
Time frame: 6 months
Diagnostic accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution compared to diary
Within-participant correlation between seizure counts per month from participant-reported seizure diary and 'ground truth' EEG seizure occurrences per month
Time frame: 6 months
Clinician rating of accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ
Clinician rating of accuracy of 24/7 EEG SubQ solution
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical relevance of the 24/7 EEG SubQ solution
Change over time for average Health Care Professional (HCP) questionnaires 'Communication', 'Insight' \& 'Potential of 24/7 EEG™' scores
Time frame: baseline, 2 months and 6 months
Proportion of treating clinicians changing clinical management
Proportion of treating clinicians changing clinical management throughout the study due to information from the 24/7 EEG SubQ Solution
Time frame: months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Participants' perception of the value of receiving feedback about seizure occurrences estimated from EEG data recorded with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ
Participants overall rating of the value of receiving feedback about seizures occurrences every month, across the full study period, from the EEG data recorded with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ
Time frame: 6 months
participants' acceptability of real-world implementation with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution
Post-market surveillance questionnaire
Time frame: baseline, 2 months and 6 months
Participant adherence with 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution
Wear time
Time frame: 6 months
Device deficiency
Number of Device deficiencies
Time frame: 6 months
EQ-5D-5L score
Change over time for average EQ-5D-5L scores at baseline, 2- months and 6 months
Time frame: baseline, 2 months and 6 months
Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) score
Change over time for average Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) scores at baseline, 2-months and 6 months
Time frame: baseline, 2 months and 6 months
Impact of epilepsy score
Change over time for average Impact of epilepsy score at baseline, 2-months and 6 months
Time frame: baseline, 2 months and 6 months
Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score
Change over time for average Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score at baseline, 2-months and 6 months
Time frame: baseline, 2 months and 6 months
health economic impact of epilepsy for participants that have used the 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution
Client Services Receipt Inventory (CSRI) scores at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
health economic impact of epilepsy for participants compared to historical controls
Client Services Receipt Inventory (CSRI) score at 6 months compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Time frame: 6 months
Cost-effectiveness of current practice and 24/7 EEG™ SubQ Solution
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) score
Time frame: 6 months
EQ-5D-5L score comparison with historical controls
EQ-5D-5L score compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Time frame: 6 months
Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) score comparison with historical controls
Participant Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) score compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Time frame: 6 months
Impact of epilepsy score comparison with historical controls
Impact of epilepsy score compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Time frame: 6 months
Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score comparison with historical controls
Perceived Self-Mastery Over Epilepsy score compared with the 138 participants in SMILE study in the treatment-as-usual arm
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.