This study is researching an experimental drug called odronextamab (referred to as study drug), in combination with lenalidomide. The study is focused on participants who have one of two types of cancer: follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) that has come back after treatment (called "relapsed"), or did not respond to treatment (called "refractory"). FL and MZL are subtypes of Non-Hodgkin 's lymphoma (NHL). This study will be made up of two parts (Part 1 not randomized, Part 2 randomized - controlled). The aim of Part 1 of the study is to see how safe and tolerable the study drug is when used in combination with lenalidomide, in participants with FL or MZL, and to determine the dose of the study drug to be used in Part 2 of this study. This combination is considered "first-in-human" as it has not been tested as a combination treatment in humans before. The aim of Part 2, of the study is to assess how well the combination of the study drug and lenalidomide works compared to the combination of rituximab (called "the comparator drug") and lenalidomide. The combination of comparator drug and lenalidomide is the current standard-of-care treatment for relapsed/refractory FL and/or MZL. Standard-of-care means the usual medication expected and used when receiving treatment for a condition. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * What side effects may happen from taking the study drug in combination with lenalidomide * How much study drug is in the blood at different times * Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the study drug less effective or could lead to side effects) * The impact from the study drug on quality-of-life and ability to complete routine daily activities
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
470
Administered per the protocol
Administered per the protocol
Administered per the protocol
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGBoca Raton Clinical Research (BRCR) Global
Plantation, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGIndiana University and Comprehensive Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
RECRUITINGHattiesburg Clinic
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) for odronextamab in combination with lenalidomide
Part 1
Time frame: Up to 35 days
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) for odronextamab in combination with lenalidomide
Part 1
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Severity of TEAEs for odronextamab in combination with lenalidomide
Part 1
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as assessed by Independent Central Review (ICR) in participants with R/R FL and participants with indolent lymphoma
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Odronextamab concentrations in serum
Part 1 and Part 2
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Incidence of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to odronextamab
Part 1 and Part 2
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Magnitude of ADAs to odronextamab
Part 1 and Part 2
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Best Overall Response (BOR) as assessed by investigator review
Part 1 and Part 2
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Duration of Response (DOR) as assessed by investigator review
Part 1 and Part 2
Time frame: Up to 5 years
PFS as assessed by investigator review
Part 1 and Part 2
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Complete Response (CR) as assessed by ICR
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 30 months
BOR as assessed by ICR
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Event Free Survival (EFS) as assessed by ICR
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 5 years
EFS as assessed by local investigator review
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 5 years
DOR as assessed by ICR
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time To Next anti-lymphoma Treatment (TTNT)
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Incidence of TEAEs for odronextamab in combination with lenalidomide versus R2
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Severity of TEAEs for odronextamab in combination with lenalidomide versus R2
Part 2
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Overall change in patient reported outcomes (PROs) as measured by scores of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30)
Part 2 The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting), a global health status (GHS)/QoL scale, and six single items (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, shortness of breath, appetite loss and financial difficulties). For the functioning scales and global health status/QoL, scores range from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" with higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales, scores range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall change in PROs as measured by scores of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-LymS)
Part 2 The FACT-Lym lymphoma subscale (LymS) includes 15 items to assess NHL-related symptoms and concerns. All questions are answered on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). Higher scores are associated with a worse quality of life.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall change in PROs as measured by scores of EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)
Part 2 The EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: "no problems", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems". The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled "Best imaginable health state" and "Worst imaginable health state".
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Change from first assessment in Patient Global Impression on Severity (PGIS)
Part 2 The PGIS includes a single-item to assess how a patient perceives the overall severity of cancer symptoms over the past 7 days. Patients will choose the response that best describes the severity of their overall cancer symptoms with options on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (No symptoms) to 4 (Very Severe).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Change from first assessment in Patient Global Impression on Change (PGIC)
Part 2 The PGIC item includes a single-item to assess how a patient perceives their overall change in health status since the start of study treatment. Patients will choose from response options on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (Much Better) to 7 (Much worse); 1- Much Better, 2-Moderately Better, 3-A Little Better, 4-About the Same, 5-A Little Worse, 6-Moderately Worse, 7-Much Worse.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Change from first assessment in the Global Population item 5 (GP5) items of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire
Part 2 A single item (GP5) of the validated FACT-G questionnaire will be used to assess from the participant perspective the overall impact of treatment side-effect. The question item is on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Dartmouth Cancer Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
RECRUITINGStony Brook University Hospital
Stony Brook, New York, United States
RECRUITINGClinical Research Alliance Inc
Westbury, New York, United States
RECRUITINGProhealth Care Inc
Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States
RECRUITINGLiverpool Hospital
Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
RECRUITINGCalvary Mater Newcastle
Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
RECRUITING...and 157 more locations