Through the method of a clinical randomized controlled trial, patients meeting the study criteria are randomly assigned to either the Denosumab treatment group or a placebo group. After a treatment period of 12 months, the differences in osteoporosis and sarcopenia-related baseline assessment changes between the two groups are compared. This is to explore the effect of Denosumab in treating osteoporosis and its impact on sarcopenia. The goal is to evaluate the efficacy of Denosumab in treating osteoporosis in the domestic population and its related impact on sarcopenia, with the aim of providing an effective treatment option for the domestic population suffering from 'osteoporosis-sarcopenia syndrome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
86
Denosumab injection 60mg (1.0ml/ branch, Jiangsu Taikang Biological Medicine Co., LTD., s20233111), once every 6 months, 60mg, subcutaneous injection, at the same time to supplement calcium and vitamin D.
Placebo drug, the main component of normal saline injection (1.0ml/ dose). In addition to the different production batch number, its appearance, character, specification, administration mode and frequency are exactly the same as the experimental group of drugs (different production batch number is convenient for later unblinding reference). Take calcium and vitamin D supplements.
Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, China
RECRUITINGOsteoporosis-related Primary Outcome
Bone mineral density (BMD) changed from baseline after 6 and 12 months of treatment in both groups. (DXA method, T value has no specific unit of measure) Bone transformation markers (BTM) changed from baseline after 6 and 12 months of treatment in both groups. (Total P1NP（ng/ml）, total 25 hydroxyvitamin D（nmol/L）, osteocalcin N-terminal fragment（ng/ml）, βCrossLap（pg/ml）) After 6 and 12 months of treatment, osteoporosis related blood biochemistry(TBIL, DBIL, Cr, UA, HCY in umol/L, BUN, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, Ca, IP in mmol/L, ALB, PAB in g/L, CK, ALT, AST, GGT in U/L), blood routine(WBC, PLT, NEU, LYMPH, MONO, EOS in G/L, RBC in T/L, HGB in g/L), inflammatory indicators(IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 in pg/mL), and related hormones(PTH, CT in ng/L) changed from baseline. Changes in the above indicators from the baseline are possible or hypothetical, and all are subject to experimental results.
Time frame: 1 year
Sarcopenia-related Primary Outcome
After 6 and 12 months of treatment, the SARC-F scale was evaluated compared with baseline.(No unit of measure) After 6 and 12 months of treatment, muscle strength (dominant hand grip strength, Kg) changed from baseline in both groups. After 6 and 12 months of treatment, skeletal muscle mass (ASM in Kg), skeletal muscle mass index (ASM and height will be combined to report ASMI in Kg/m²), body fat percentage（%） and limb fat percentage（%）in both groups were changed from baseline. (BIA method) After 6 and 12 months of treatment, the walking speed of 6 M（m/s） and the sitting time of 5 times(s) were changed from baseline. Changes in the above indicators from the baseline are possible or hypothetical, and all are subject to experimental results.
Time frame: 1 year
Quality of life and fall risk
Changes in quality of life and fall risk from baseline were assessed using the abbreviated Health Survey Form (SF-36) and the Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale at the end of 12 months of treatment in both groups.(The score has no specific unit of measure) Changes in the above scale from the baseline are possible or hypothetical, and all are subject to experimental results.
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.