The current study is a clinical trial, meaning a research study in which human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related behavioral outcomes. Specifically, male and female adolescents with current suicidal intent will be randomly assigned to receive either a 1-hour session of virtual crisis response planning (CRP), a 1-hour session of in-person CRP, or a 1-hour session of standard crisis risk management (treatment as usual). The feasibility and acceptability of the virtual CRP, compared to in-person CRP, will be assessed 14 days post-treatment. Additional assessments of changes in mood, behavior, and suicidality will be collected daily for 14 days post-treatment via ecological momentary assessments. The investigators hypothesize the following: 1) Virtual CRP will be rated as more feasible and acceptable compared to traditional CRP and treatment as usual interventions; 2) Both versions of CRP will be associated with changes in frequency and severity of suicidal ideation and behavior compared to treatment as usual; 3) Virtual CRP will be equally as effective as traditional CRP at reducing suicide risk, suggesting that virtual CRP is a promising scalable intervention adaptation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
57
Individuals complete a chat-based experimental collaborative suicide intervention virtually.
Individuals complete a collaborative suicide intervention in-person.
Individuals complete a standard crisis risk management intervention.
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Number of Participants With Self-reported Use of the Treatment Plan in the Crisis Response Planning (CRP) Treatment Arms
Self-reported utilization of the crisis response planning (CRP) treatment was assessed at the end of the trial. Participants randomized to one of the CRP treatment arms were asked to complete a form assessing whether participants used their CRP plan in the two weeks following the intervention (yes or no). Individuals in the virtual crisis risk counseling control group did not complete the CRP use form.
Time frame: Two weeks after the intervention session
Changes in Suicidal Ideation, Intent, Behaviors, and Urges as Measured by Ecological Momentary Assessments.
Self-reported suicidal ideation, intent, behaviors, and urges will be repeatedly assessed 5 times per day for 14 days before the intervention and 14 days after the intervention using ecological momentary assessments (EMA). A composite suicide risk score was calculated for each day by averaging five suicide risk items (range per item 0 - 10). Higher composite scores indicate greater suicide risk.
Time frame: Average suicide risk score across the 14 days before the intervention and across the 14 days post-intervention.
Number of Participants Who Reported Thoughts of Death and Suicide at 2 Weeks Post-Intervention
Thoughts of death and suicide will be assessed utilizing the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) questionnaire. The ASQ utilizes "yes" or "no" questions to assess thoughts of death and suicide "during the past few weeks". Post-treatment endorsement of ASQ item 3 (i.e., "yes" response) will be compared across the three treatment arms.
Time frame: Approximately 2 weeks after treatment.
Changes in Suicidal Ideation, Intent, Behaviors, and Urges as Measured by the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI) Questionnaire Total Score.
Self-reported suicidal ideation, intent, behaviors, and urges will be assessed utilizing the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI) questionnaire. Each question on the BSSI utilizes a rating scale of 0, 1, and 2 and a total score is calculated by summing the score for each question (range 0-38; higher scores indicate greater severity of suicidal ideation).
Time frame: Approximately 2 weeks before treatment and approximately 2 weeks after treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.