The genicular artery embolization vs nerve ablation intervention (GENI) knee OA study is a three-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in patients after receiving one of three interventions: sham procedure, geniculate artery embolization (GAE) or genicular nerve phenol nerve ablation (PNA). The main question\[s\] the study aims to answer are: * Does GAE or genicular nerve PNA result in OA symptom alleviation compared to sham procedure? * Are there molecular or imaging biomarkers that aid in predicting treatment response for GAE or genicular nerve PNA? Subjects (N=150) patients with knee OA, resistant to non-surgical treatment for at least 3 months will be randomized 1:1:1 to either after GAE, genicular nerve PNA or sham procedure. Clinical outcomes will be measured using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain completed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months and then every 6 months for either two years or until the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery.
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a common and debilitating disease. Advanced disease can be treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however knee OA that is either resistant to non-surgical options, or where surgical options are not available, represents a specific management challenge. Genicular artery embolization (GAE) and genicular nerve phenol nerve ablation (PNA) have emerged as potentially successful treatments to reduce knee OA symptoms, however, to date no randomized controlled trials have been completed comparing the two procedures. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of GAE to genicular nerve PNA for chronic knee pain in patients with knee OA. Further, molecular biomarkers and imaging will be taken pre- and post-procedure to evaluate if immune-mediated neuroinflammation and angiogenesis can be helpful in predicting treatment response. This single center randomized controlled trial will be conducted to determine if GAE, genicular nerve PNA, or sham procedure is associated with a clinically significant alleviation of knee OA symptoms. The investigators aim to include 150 participants in this study over the course of 24 months randomized 1:1:1 to receive either GAE, genicular nerve PNA, or sham procedure. After eligibility is confirmed and consent is obtained, a baseline assessment will be conducted including baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain scores. Participants will receive a knee 3T MRI with gadolinium contrast and 0.5 - 5 mL of synovial fluid will be aspirated for baseline analysis. Participants will receive Fitbit motion trackers to quantify activity levels throughout the study. Study procedures will be performed by either a qualified Interventional Radiologist or fellowship-trained Anesthesiologist, depending on which study arm subjects randomized to. Approximately 3 months after the procedure, repeat WOMAC and NRS scores will be obtained, in addition to repeat 3T MRI with gadolinium contrast and knee aspirate of 0.5 - 5 mL of synovial fluid. Additional questions pertaining to knee-specific analgesia use, adverse events from the procedure, or any concerns will be addressed and noted at this time. Participants will be followed up by phone by a blinded member of the research team 6 months after the procedure and every 6 months thereafter for 2 years or until the time of TKA surgery (if applicable). During phone calls, questions relating to knee-specific analgesia use will be asked and repeat WOMAC and NRS scores will be acquired. Data for this study includes: demographic information, knee-specific analgesia use, which procedure was performed, knee 3T MRI with gadolinium contrast, WOMAC scores, NRS pain scores, knee synovial fluid cytokine/chemokine biomarker analysis, and procedure-specific adverse events.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
150
Femoral arterial access will be obtained under ultrasound guidance. An angiographic catheter will then be advanced to the distal superficial femoral artery. Angiography will be performed to identify the appropriate genicular branches supplying the regions of hyperemia. A microcatheter (1.7-2.4-French) will then be advanced super-selectively into the genicular arteries and 100-300 um EmboSpheres (Merit Medical) will be injected under fluoroscopic guidance. Multiple geniculate arteries may be embolized until neovascularity is no longer seen and pathologic hyperemia is resolved. A repeat lower extremity angiogram will be performed to evaluate for success of embolization and to exclude complication. The catheter and sheath will then be removed, and hemostasis will be achieved using an AngioSeal (Terumo Vascular Interventions) vascular closure device.
A high frequency ultrasound probe and anatomic landmarks will be used to identify the location of the genicular nerves as well as the nerves to the vastus lateralis, vastus intermedius and vastus medialis. Utilizing an in or out of plane approach as necessary, a 25 g spinal needle will be advanced to the appropriate location after skin anesthesia with 1cc of 1% lidocaine. After negative aspiration, 2 cc of 6% phenol will be injected at each location with an end target of fascial expansion under the relevant fascial plane.
A high frequency ultrasound probe and anatomic landmarks will be used to identify the location of the genicular nerves as well as the nerves to the vastus lateralis, vastus intermedius and vastus medialis will be identified. Utilizing an in or out of plane approach as necessary, a 25 g spinal needle will be advanced to the appropriate location after skin anesthesia with 1cc of 1% lidocaine. After negative aspiration, 1.5 cc of sterile saline will then be injected at each location.
Kingston Health Sciences Centre
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGChanges in knee pain/functionality post geniculate artery embolization versus nerve ablation vs sham
Overall efficacy of treatment as determined by a clinically significant reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire of 20 points or more. The WOMAC is a questionnaire evaluating knee osteoarthritis with subcategory scores for pain (0-20 points), stiffness (0 - points), physical function (0-8 points), and sum total score (0-96 points) with higher values indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 3 months
Changes in numerical rating scale pain scores post geniculate artery embolization versus nerve ablation vs sham
Assessment of changes in the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates maximal pain. A decrease of 2 points or more from baseline will be considered a minimal clinically important decrease.
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Assessment of desire for total knee arthroplasty post geniculate artery embolization versus nerve ablation vs sham
Participants will be asked whether they feel their current symptoms are still sufficiently severe that they would like to proceed with knee replacement.
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Evaluation of MRI
Assessment of change in MRI features using whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. The WORMS assesses 14 subregions of the knee divided by anatomical landmarks. In each subreagion, 14 types of structural changes are assessed. This include: cartilage integrity, subarticular bone marrow edema, subarticular cysts, subarticular bone flattening, marginal ostophytes, medial-lateral meniscal tears, integrity of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, integrity of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments, synovitis/effusion, loose body, and periarticular cysts/bursitis. The sum of all anatomic regions and structural feature scores is the total WORMS score from 0 - 332 with a higher score indicating MRI features associated with more severe osteoarthritis.
Time frame: 3 months
Evaluation of Synovial Fluid
Synovial fluid samples taken before study intervention and 3 months post intervention will be compared. Protein from each sample will be assessed using multiplex Luminex analysis for targeted inflammatory protein expression using EMD Millipore Human Cytokine/Chemokine/Growth Factor panel.
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.