Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury After Administration of Iodine Contrast Media in Patients With Reduced Renal Function

Overview

This study is examining if injection of iodine contrast media increases the risk of acute kidney injury in patients with severely reduced renal function. All patients who have a medical need for a computerized tomography, either with or without iodine contrast media, and has a renal function of less than estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30 will be recruited. Blood and urine samples will be collected at baseline, three and 21 days after the computerized tomography. Additionally, we will examine if the decision to use iodine contrast media or not was easy or difficult if the use of iodine contrast media potentially changed the patient care and if it might have been lifesaving.

This is a single centre prospective cohort study performed at a tertiary level, university hospital in Sweden. Background data included age, sex, height, and weight. Body surface area (BSA) is calculated with DuBois formula. Clinical history consists of chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension and liver failure. Details regarding the CT such as examined body part, clinical question on CT referral, if iodine contrast media (ICM) was used and, if so, which dose, type and concentration is going to be recorded. Blood and urine samples will be collected three times prospectively and, if available, previously recorded plasma creatinine values will be recorded once as well. The retrospective value is recorded at least seven days before CT. The prospective values are going to be recorded within 24 hours before CT, 72 hours after CT and 21 days after CT. The following biomarkers are analysed in plasma: bicarbonate, creatinine, cystatin C and endostatin. The following biomarkers are analysed in urine: angiotensinogen (AGT), creatinine, cystatin C, endostatin, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), neutrophile gelatinase associated lipase (NGAL) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2). The revised Lund-Malmö formula is used to calculate eGFR based on creatinine. The Caucasian and Asian Paediatric and Adult subjects (CAPA) formula is used to calculate eGFR from Cystatin C. Five yes or no-questions are going to be answered, two before the exam and three after. The questions answered before the exam will be answered by the radiologist who decided upon the exam protocol, and they are investigating if the decision to use ICM or not was easy to make. The questions after the exam are going to be answered by two senior radiologists independent of each other and they relate to if ICM helped in the discovery of clinically relevant information and if that information/condition was life-threatening. The third question will be answered by going through the patient's discharge summary and is looking at the main diagnosis and if that diagnosis would have been easier to discover with the use of ICM. Since no clear definition of life-threatening exists all diagnoses that were considered life-threatening will be stated in the manuscript. The data will be recorded in the electronic data capture REDCap. Sample size has been calculated based on an incidence of 14%, a margin of error of 5% and a 95% confidence interval. If there will be to much missing data to run a complete observation analysis, and especially if it is unbalanced between ICM and no ICM an imputation will be performed. Association will be evaluated with logistic regression. Test of difference among groups will be performed with chi-2 test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. If to many data points are missing and especially if it is unbalanced between groups imputation will be performed. Data will be presented as median and interquartile range or as frequency in percent where suitable. A significance level of 0.05 will be used.