The present randomized controlled trial aims to assess the influence of a new prosthodontics device (Gingival Former Abutment -GFA) on peri-implant bone loss and soft tissue changes and health after subcrestal oral implant placement. The participants will be divided in two groups and receive either crestal implant placement and traditional healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement and GFA. Clinical and radiographic examination will be performed at implant placement surgery, prosthetic load, 6 and 12 months follow-up.
According to current literature, physiological bone loss around oral implants is expected after placement and load (1 mm during the first year and 0.2 mm each subsequent year). Different implant designs and surgical protocols have been tested to minimize bone resorption, and subcrestal implant placement partially seems to overcome this issue. However, if this procedure increases the length of the transmucosal tunnel, increasing the risk of peri-implant soft tissue infection. The GFA was created to limit both the loss of peri-implant crestal bone and the extension of the transmucosal tunnel. The GFA follows the "one abutment one time" concept, which is believed to limit disturbances of the peri-implant hard and soft tissues healing due to the removal of the traditional healing abutments during prosthetic load procedures. Our objective is to validate or deny this claim. The study is a monocentric, pragmatic, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of parallel design. The trial will have a one-year duration, with data collection at the surgical phase, at implant load and 6 and 12 months after load. The primary outcome will be radiographical MBL (marginal bone level) changes around the implant. Secondary outcomes will be the assessment of the peri-implant soft tissues.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
GFA is positioned on the sub-crestal implant during the surgery and it is no longer removed. This follows the "one abutment one time" concept and should prevent bone loss and transmucosal tunnel.
Placement of the endosseous sub-crestal dental implant through dedicated drills with 35 Newton insertion torque. It is positioned 2 mm under the crestal bone.
A healing abutment is positioned on crestal implant during surgery. It is removed at prosthetic finalization.
A zirconia prosthetic crown finalizes the implant rehabilitation.
Placement of the endosseous crestal implant through dedicated drills with 35 Newton insertion torque at level of the alveolar bone.
Magda Mensi
Brescia, Lombardy, Italy
Change in Marginal Bone Level (MBL)
The reabsorption of the bone measured through radiographically change on standardised radiographs. Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits.
Time frame: Surgery, 3, 9 and 15 months
Change in PD (periodontal depth) (implant site)
Change in periodontal depth value (from the gingival margin to the bottom of the pocket). Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits.
Time frame: 3, 9 and 15 months
Change in REC (Clinical Gingival Recession) (implant site)
Change in recession value should be calculated. Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits.
Time frame: 3, 9 and 15 months
Change in BOP (Bleeding on Probing) (implant site)
Change in percentage of sites positive to bleeding on probing (4 point each situ). Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits.
Time frame: 3, 9 and 15 months
Change in PI (Plaque Index) (implant site)
Change in percentage of site with plaque (4 point each situ). Baseline values will be compared to the values recorded in the follow-up visits.
Time frame: 3, 9 and 15 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.