Online MBCT vs HEP for Depressive Symptoms in Older Adults: RCT

Overview

In Canada, depression affects more than 300,000 adults over the age of 60, which costs the healthcare system an estimated $5 billion each year. Late-life depression (LLD) is associated with more deaths, more physical and mental health problems. LLD is hard to treat, as many people will not respond to treatment and many will stop taking antidepressant medication due to negative side-effects. Unfortunately, common non-medication treatments like cognitive behavioral therapy are often inaccessible because of long (6-12 months) wait times and high costs. In a previous study, we found that an 8-week group mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program improved depressive symptoms more than regular LLD treatment (i.e. antidepressants and/or support counseling). Now, a larger scale study is required to compare MBCT to an active control group. Furthermore, research and clinical experience during and post-Covid pandemic has shown that older adults are nowadays far less likely to participate in in-person intervention studies but appreciate and tolerate Zoom delivery of behavioral interventions. This study will compare the effects of MBCT versus an active control group, Health Enhancement Program (HEP), both delivered by Zoom, to see if it improves symptoms of depression in older adults. The study team plans to recruit approximately 100-120 participants in across Canada, who will be randomly assigned to 8-weeks of either MBCT or HEP, delivered by Zoom. The investigators will observe if these treatments improve depression as well as cognition by conducting in-person cognitive assessments. Currently there is a lack of affordable and accessible non-medication treatments for LLD that can be scaled to reach many people. If successful, Mindfulness may be a potential solution, as it is easily given in groups and is well-tolerated by older adults with LLD.

Depression in older adults is associated with increased mortality, physical comorbidity, and neurocognitive decline. Up to 50-80% of patients are resistant to pharmacotherapy. Although psychotherapies such as cognitive behavioral therapy are effective for depression, such treatments are expensive and difficult to access, often with 6-12 month wait lists in Canada. There is a need for innovative non-pharmacological treatments for depression in older adults that are scalable and potentially cost-effective. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) stands out as a promising solution due to its scalable group format, good tolerability, and growing evidence of its efficacy in treating depression in adults. As well, clinical and research experience since Covid has shown that older adults have been much less likely to participate in in-person behavioral interventions. Preliminary data in LLD: Our research group completed an 8-week intervention of MBCT (as an adjunct to treatment as usual =TAU) vs. TAU in older adults with depression +/- anxiety symptoms (N=61). MBCT was superior to TAU in improving depression scores (-7.9 (±4.4) vs. -4.0 (±4.7) point change, U = 179.5, p = 0.002), with a large effect size (d = 0.86). Furthermore, the investigators have conducted a number of pilot studies, which have established that older adults can feasibly use and enjoy behavioral interventions via teleconferencing. This study is the next step for a properly powered Phase III RCT (n=100-120) with an active comparator (HEP: Health Education Program) to establish the effectiveness of this novel intervention for LLD. Research Aims: Primary Objective: Using an 8-week RCT, assess whether MBCT improves scores of depressive symptoms scores compared to an active control (Health Enhancement Program (HEP)). Hypothesis 1A: The MBCT group will have a lower score in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) at 8-weeks, compared to HEP controls. Secondary Objective: To investigate the effects of MBCT on cognitive function in older adults experiencing depression. Hypothesis 2A: MBCT will lead to higher scores in executive functioning and processing speed at 8 weeks. Hypothesis 2B: The MBCT group will have higher scores of quality of life (EQ-5D) scores at 8-weeks. Exploratory Objective: To investigate effects of MBCT on scores of anxiety (GAD-7) and mindfulness presence (Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) Hypothesis 3A: The MBCT group will have reduced scores in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) at 8-weeks, compared to HEP controls. Hypothesis 3B: The MBCT group will have a higher score in mindfulness presence (FFMQ), compared to HEP controls. Methods/Expertise: This study proposes an 8-week randomized controlled trial (RCT) for participants aged 60 years and older who score 10 or more points on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS). An independent researcher will randomize participants, using computer software, stratified by baseline cognitive scores (T-MoCA: 19-25 and 26+ points), 1:1 to MBCT vs. an active control (HEP), virtually delivered via teleconferencing. This study will be a blinded to allocation (rater, investigator, and clinician) RCT. The investigators will conduct assessments of 1) depression scores (primary objective), 2) quality of life (EQ5D) cognition (neurocognitive battery), and 3) anxiety (GAD-7) and mindfulness (FFMQ) before and after virtually-delivered MBCT or HEP. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 8 weeks. The investigators have expertise in late-life mood disorders, mindfulness clinical trials, geriatric psychiatry, cognitive assessment, and biostatistics. (all additional details can be found by section below)