Clinical Performance of Injectable Composite Resins in Class I Cavities

N/AActive Not RecruitingNCT06192667

Hacettepe University30 enrolled

Overview

Purpose of research: Evaluation and comparison of 24-month clinical performance of injectable and conventional resin composites in class I cavities.

The mechanical properties of conventional resin composites have been tried to be improved. In addition to the developed mechanical properties, the need for easy and fast application led to the development of flowable composites. Flowable composites have lower filler ratio than conventional hybrid composites so they are less rigid and have lower modulus of elasticity. For these reasons, the use of flowable composites in areas that may be exposed to high forces, especially occlusal cavities, is not recommended. Today, it is aimed to increase the wear resistance by increasing the amount of filler in flowable composites and producing injectable composites. A new product recently introduced to the market, a high-strength nano-filled injectable composite material, GC's G-ænial Universal Injectable(Tokyo,Japan), was also included in the study. This is a low-viscosity composite in which modifications have been made to provide a product with high wear resistance and depth of cure to make it suitable for posterior restorations. One lesion in each patient will be randomly assigned to be restored using either the G-aenial Universal Injectable or Filtek Z250 resin composites. The adhesive, G2-BOND Universal will be used for adhesive procedures. The clinical procedure for the restorations will be performed by a single operator. The restorations will be evaluated by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24 months in accordance with the modified USPHS criteria. Data will be statistically analyzed using the Chi-square and Cochran Q tests (p \< 0.05).

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Caries,Dental

Interventions

GC Geanial Injectable (Tokyo,Japan)DEVICE

Highly filled composite resin

3M Filtek Z250 Universal Restorative (Germany)DEVICE

Conventional composite resin

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 35 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Healthy individuals who do not have any systemic disease that prevents restorative treatment * Individuals between the ages of 18-35 * Brushing your teeth twice a day * Having at least 20 teeth in occlusion and at least 2 occlusal lesions with antagonist teeth in the opposite arch * Volunteer individuals who agree to participate in the research and sign the informed consent form and who have undergone initial periodontal treatment will be included in the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Individuals with advanced periodontal disease * Individuals using removable partial dentures * Individuals with bruxism * Individuals with malocclusion * Patients with known allergies to resin-based restorative materials and bonding agents * Patients with a history of allergy to local anesthesia * Endodontic treatment, teeth that need pulp capping or endodontic treatment is available

Locations (1)

Hacettepe University

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Marginal Adaptation

Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal adaptation. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores; Alfa: Closely adapted, no visible crevice. Bravo: Visible crevice, explorer will penetrate. Charlie: Crevice in which dentin is exposed

Time frame: From baseline to 24 month

Marginal Staining

Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal staining. Marginal staining was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores: Alfa: No discoloration. Bravo: Discoloration without. Charlie: Discoloration with penetration in pulpal direction

Time frame: From baseline to 24 month

Retention

Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: No loss of restorative material. Charlie: Any loss of restorative material

Time frame: From baseline to 24 month

Postoperative sensitivity

Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: Not present. Bravo: sensitive but diminishing in intensity. Charlie:constant sensitivity, not diminishing in intensity

Time frame: From baseline to 24 month

Seconder caries

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.