To Compare between outcomes of Antibiotic Prophylaxis and No antibiotic prophylaxis in non-complicated low risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy
There is no doubt that Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the surgery of choice in cholelithiasis \[1\]. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis in LC decreases the rate of intra and post operative infections specifically the Surgical site infection (SSI) \[2\]. However, the rate of antibiotic side effects remains considerable, mainly antibiotic resistance to the commonly used antibiotics as Cefoperazone and other antibiotics used in routine prophylaxis \[3\]. So Some studies proved that No need for antibiotic prophylaxis \[4\]. In spite, no antibiotic prophylaxis may lead to infections mainly SSI and prolongation of hospitalization time \[5\]. However None of these studies has proved Superiority over the other and stills a matter of controversy \[6\]. For this reason more efforts are directed to limit the use of antibiotic in non complicated low risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prophylaxis in this study is directed to start from time of admission till 1 month post operative. In our study we Follow both outcomes to compare between both techniques
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
200
Use of prophylactic antibiotics in lap cholecystectomy
To compare between infection rate at both groups
Group 1; Prophylactic Antibiotics in LC and Group 2; No prophylactic antibiotics in LC
Time frame: Baseline
Hospitalization time
Group 1; Prophylactic Antibiotics in LC and Group 2; No prophylactic antibiotics in LC
Time frame: Baseline
Improve quality of life to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic cholecystitis
Group 1; Prophylactic Antibiotics in LC and Group 2; No prophylactic antibiotics in LC
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.