To assess the accuracy of the computer assessed guides in horizontal bone augmentation achieved at posterior mandible using guided modified ridge splitting technique versus free hand modified ridge splitting technique
The first treatment plan includes harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area using a computer-modified surgical guide. The second treatment plan includes manually harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area without a surgical guide.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
18
treatment plan includes harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area using a computer-modified surgical guide
treatment plan includes manually harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area without a surgical guide.
Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University
Cairo, Manial, Egypt
Accuracy of the Computer Assessed Guide in the study group
Accuracy of the Computer Assessed Guide in the study group In comparison with the control group between predicted and immediately postoperative horizontal bone width with Cone beam computed tomography in Millimeters measurement tool is CBCT scan superimposition in mm
Time frame: immediately postoperative
Alveolar ridge horizontal bone gain
measure the amount of horizontal bone width gaining by postoperative cone beam computed tomography in millimeters measurement tool is CBCT scan superimposition in mm
Time frame: 4 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.