Study Objectives: Primary: • To assess the safety, tolerability, and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of AZU-101 Secondary: • To evaluate efficacy of daily vaginal doses of AZU-101 in postmenopausal women on vaginal epithelium
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2A study of vaginal AZU-101 in healthy postmenopausal female participants with moderate to severe vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) with no contraindications to selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). AZU-101 is a vaginal formulation of lasofoxifene tartrate, a SERM that has high affinity to both estrogen receptor (ER) alpha (ERα) and ER beta (ERβ). This study plans to evaluate 3 doses of AZU-101 (1, 0.5, and 0.1μg) and placebo. Results of the first cohort (1μg AZU-101) will direct additional dosing cohorts (0.5 and 0.1μg AZU-101). Safety and tolerability will be measured by vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, and the incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and concomitant treatments. The PK profile will be assessed using peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to peak plasma concentration (tmax), and area-under-the-concentration-time-curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞). Efficacy will be evaluated using vaginal pH, the vaginal Maturation Index (percentage of vaginal parabasal cells and superficial cells), and identification of the most bothersome symptom to the subject (dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, or vaginal irritation/itching). Number of participants (planned): Up to approximately 90 healthy postmenopausal females, 45 to 60 years of age.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
90
1.0 ug for 14 daily doses
Nucleus Network
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGNumber of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events or Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events With Severity Greater Than "Moderate" as measured by CTCAE v4.0
Number of participants who had any serious adverse events or any adverse events with severity greater than "moderate," as determined by the Principal Investigator, using the composite safety assessment including clinical laboratory testing (full blood count, biochemistry, coagulation, lipid panel, thyroid hormone, urinalysis), ECG, vital signs, physical examination, transvaginal ultrasound, endometrial biopsy, and self-reporting of adverse events that are determined to be clinically significant.
Time frame: 15 days
Pharmacokinetics (AUC0-∞)
Area under the concentration versus time curve in pg\*hr/mL
Time frame: 24 hours after day 1 and day 14
Pharmacokinetics (Tmax)
Time to peak plasma concentration in hours
Time frame: 24 hours after day 1 and day 14
Pharmacokinetics (Cmax)
Peak plasma concentration in pg/mL
Time frame: 24 hours after day 1 and day 14
Efficacy (Vaginal pH)
• Mean change from baseline in vaginal pH
Time frame: Day 7 and 15
Efficacy (Maturation index)
* Mean change from baseline in percentage of superficial cells in the Maturation Index of the vaginal smear * Mean change from baseline in percentage of parabasal cells in the Maturation Index of the vaginal smear
Time frame: Day 7 and 15
Efficacy (symptoms)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Mean change in the most bothersome symptom identified by the participant Efficacy outcome will be proportion of subjects who improve at least one grade
Time frame: 15 days