The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the combination treatment of hydroxyurea capsules and valproic acid capsules, or the combination treatment of 6-mercaptopurine tablets and valproic acid capsules in male and female patients aged 18 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia or high- risk myelodysplastic syndrome. The population to be studied is newly diagnosed AML patients who are considered unfit for standard induction chemotherapy, HR-MDS unfit/ineligible for standard treatment, and relapsed/refractory AML/HR-MDS patients who are considered unfit for standard therapy ,or are, for some reason, ineligible for another type of therapy. Clinically, hydroxyurea, valproic acid and 6-mercaptopurine are historically very well-known therapeutic agents with low toxicity profiles. The rationale for this study is that the combination of these drugs with low toxicity will be well tolerated in elderly AML patients with comorbidities, or lower performance status. This combination could have a beneficial therapeutic effect on overall survival and contribute to a better quality of life.
This a two-part, open-label phase 1/2 study that will include clinical sites in Norway and other Nordic countries. The study consists of part A and part B. Part A will run in Norway only. Part B will run in Norway and the Nordic countries. Both part A and part B have two different treatment combinations (T), combination 1 and combination 2. Part B is a cohort expansion of part A (if part A proves to be positive). Treatment combination 1 (T1): hydroxyurea + valproic acid. Treatment combination 2 (T2): 6-mercaptopurine + valproic acid. Each patient enrolled in the trial will start and will receive at least one cycle with T1: hydroxyurea and valproic acid. The first cycle in the study always constitutes of hydroxyurea (1000 mg twice a day) plus valproic acid (300 mg + 600 mg) for 14 days; this will be followed by a 14-day period with no medication. Each cycle duration is 28 days. Patients who do not experience clinical benefit after the first cycle will not be eligible to continue on this regimen and they will be allocated to treatment combination 2. On the other hand, patients who do experience clinical benefit after cycle 1 with combination 1 (HU + VPA) will be further eligible to continue on this regimen/combination. However, patients on T1 will be withdrawn after consequent cycles, as soon as they do not meet the criteria for clinical benefit as defined by this protocol. Each patient who does not meet the criteria of clinical benefit after the first cycle with treatment combination 1 will switch to treatment combination 2 (T2). T2 constitutes of 6-mercaptopurine (50 mg once a day) plus valproic acid (300 mg + 600 mg) for 14 days; this will be followed by a 14-day period with no medication. Each cycle duration is 28 days. Patients will be further eligible to continue this regimen/combination for as long as they experience clinical benefit, otherwise they will be withdrawn from the study as soon as they do not meet the criteria for clinical benefit as defined by this protocol. There will be 8 patients allocated for the treatment combination 1 with HU + VPA and up to 8 patients allocated for the treatment combination 2 with 6MP + VPA. For each of the two treatment combinations, if one or more patients, of 8, experience clinical benefit\* the group will be expanded with 16 more patients in Part B. Part B consists of two cohort expansions where the setup is identical to part A, one for HU + VPA and one for 6MP + VPA, 16 patients in each, in total up to 32 new patients. In part B, the same principles will apply for response, withdrawal and allocation from HU+ VPA to 6MP + VPA. Patients treated with combination 1, who do not experience clinical benefit or experience unacceptable, unmanageable toxicity after cycle 1, will not be eligible to continue on this regimen, and they will be allocated to combination 2. It is expected that cohort expansion of combination 2 will proceed slower than cohort expansion for combination 1. If 5 or more patients of the total of 24 (part A (n=8) + part B (n=16)) experience clinical benefit, there will be considered a phase II/III expansion cohort for further effect assessment. The treatment duration in all groups can last to up 6 cycles in total, each cycle lasts for 28 days. The rationale for the flow in the study aims to ensure that the patients do not undergo prolonged periods with excessive and ineffective treatment. Assessment of treatment response consecutively after each cycle will guide the treating physician to swiftly change the treatment combination or withdraw the patient from the study accordingly. The switch to a second treatment combination as a part of the study ensures that more therapy options are available for, potentially, all patients who enroll in the trial. The enrollment is stopped when 8+16 patients with HU +VPA are treated, or if 8+16 patients are treated with 6MP + VPA. Patients will switch over to 6MP +VPA, if lack of clinical benefit. Some dose modifications are allowed when indicated according to the protocol. At screening and during the study treatment, tumor debulking with HU + 6MP is required for 5 to 7 days to reduce WBC to less than 25×10\*9/L (\<20% blasts in the peripheral blood), before each cycle, HU + VPA, or 6MP + VPA. Tumor debulking with HU + 6MP may be repeated ahead of every cycle (for both treatment combinations), and in the treating physician's discretion, if the patient tolerates this. The objectives of this study include: * To determine the safety and tolerability of the treatment combinations of hydroxyurea + valproic acid, and 6-mercaptopurine + valproic acid administered at established clinical doses * To establish the preliminary efficacy of the treatment combination of hydroxyurea and valproic acid administered at established clinical doses * To establish the preliminary efficacy of the treatment combination of 6-mercaptopurine and valproic acid administered at established clinical doses * To evaluate changes in patients performance status for baseline and during the study period The adaptive study design is based on a Simon two-stage model of expanding cohorts. This model, tested in the TAPUR, DRUP and Impress-Norway studies, has been designed to effectively test a set of drugs using a minimum of number of patients (see also Chapter 9 on Statistics). Each arm (A1, A2, B1 and B2) will be monitored using a Simon-like two-stage 'admissible' monitoring plan to identify patients with evidence of clinical benefit. Both arms in part A will enroll 8 participants, and will be considered positive if ≥1 patient show clinical benefit after at least 28 days on treatment (for each arm). In case of a positive part A (arm A1 and A2, separately), part B (arm B1 and B2, separately) will be initiated enrolling 16 additional participants in each arm into the cohort. If there are 0 patients with "clinical benefit" (as defined by this protocol) among the first 8 participants in an arm, then the respective arm will not proceed to expansion. Otherwise, an additional 16 participants will be included in each cohort expansion (B1 and B2, respectively). Four or fewer responses out of 24 will suggest a lack of activity, while 5 or more responses will suggest that further investigation of the drug in a phase 3 clinical trial is warranted. * Study duration: 5 years * Treatment duration: up to 6 months for each treatment combination * Visit frequency: every 7 days (if applicable, during the first cycle), thereafter every 28 days
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
48
Hydroxyurea (HU/hydroxycarbamide) is a hydroxylated analogue of urea which prevents DNA synthesis by inhibiting the activity of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR). HU has been used to treat a variety of diseases. As an antineoplastic drug, HU has some advantages. It may be used by ambulatory patients and has relatively few side effects, which are relieved almost immediately after withdrawal of the drug. The drug is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration. At present, HU has an important role as standard of care for treating hyperleukocytosis in chronic and acute myeloid leukemia.
Valproic acid (VPA) has been used clinically as an anticonvulsant and mood-stabilizing drug. During the last two decades, VPA has been described as a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor and gained increased interest for use in cancer therapy. VPA is administered orally with available routine measurements of serum levels and has a low toxicity profile.
In 1953, 6-MP was an approved antileukemic agent resulting in remissions in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). After adding 6-MP to methotrexate and prednisolone in the treatment regimen, the one-year mean survival of children with ALL was increased from 29% to 50%. 6-MP, even about 70 years after its discovery, remains the standard maintenance therapy once the children are in complete remission.
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Bergen, Norway
RECRUITINGSafety and tolerability of the treatment combinations of hydroxyurea + valproic acid, and 6-mercaptopurine + valproic acid administered at established clinical doses.
Safety and tolerability assessed by monitoring the incidence, frequency, and severity of AEs by using CTCAE v5.0, including evaluation of the following: * DLTs * Physical examinations * Clinical laboratory blood samples
Time frame: Evaluation every 4th week, i.e. after each treatment cycle.
Preliminary efficacy of the treatment combination of hydroxyurea and valproic acid administered at established clinical doses.
Clinical benefit in patients receiving hydroxyurea in combination with valproic acid. Clinical benefit in patients receiving 6-mercaptopurine in combination with valproic acid. Clinical benefit, in this protocol, is defined as stable disease, partial response (decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to between 5% to 25% and decrease of pre-treatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%), or better response \[European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 response criteria in AML\], and/or stable or improved ECOG performance status.
Time frame: Evaluation every 4th week, i.e. after each treatment cycle.
Changes in patients performance status from baseline and during the study period.
Baseline and longitudinal ECOG performance status of the patient (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group). The ECOG performance status scale is best at 0 (fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction), and worst at 5 (dead).
Time frame: Evaluation at baseline, i.e. before onset treatment, after 4 weeks on treatment (i.e.after first cycle), and every 4th week to a total of 24 weeks. (i.e. after each treatment cycle, up to a total of 6 cycles).
Clinical benefit.
The percentage of patients with clinical benefit (as described over) in each group (A1, A2, B1, B2).
Time frame: After 3 and 6 cycles (i.e. after 3 and 6 months from the treatment onset).
Duration of clinical benefit.
The duration of clinical benefit (in days), in each group (A1, A2, B1, B2).
Time frame: During the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end treatment.
Time to progression.
The time to progression (days), in each group (A1, A2, B1, B2).
Time frame: From the treatment onset, during the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end treatment.
Changes in reported Quality of Life (QoL) compared to baseline.
Use of health-related quality of life questionnaires: * EQ -5D-5L * QLQ-C30 * NCI- PRO-CTCAE
Time frame: At baseline, i.e. before onset treatment, after 4 weeks on treatment (i.e.after first cycle), and after each treatment cycle (every 4th week).
Survival analyses, ORR.
The overall response rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of patients with a response of complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), partial remission (PR), or no response, all as assessed by ELN response criteria 2022, in each group (A1, A2, B1, B2).
Time frame: After 3 and 6 cycles (i.e. after 3 and 6 months from the treatment onset).
Survival analyses, OS.
The overall survival (OS), in each group (A1, A2, B1, B2).
Time frame: From the treatment onset, during the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end-treatment.
Hospitalization rate per month per patient.
The number of hospital admissions per month before, during, and after study investigation.
Time frame: Before the treatment onset, during the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end treatment.
Transfusion rate per month per patient.
The number of blood-/platelet transfusions per month, during and after study investigation.
Time frame: Before the treatment onset, during the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.