This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study, which evaluates the effectiveness and safety of cold laser plaque ablation for lower limb arterial stenosis and occlusive lesions from intermittent claudication to chronic threatening limb ischemia.
This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study. This study will be conducted at four centers and is expected to enroll 110 patients. And we will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cold laser plaque ablation compared to excimer laser system for lower limb arterial stenosis and occlusive lesions.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
110
Patients were randomly divided into two groups. After being included in the two groups, different laser equipment was used to revascularize the lower limbs. The patients' revascularization status was evaluated through regular follow-up after surgery.
Patients were randomly divided into two groups. After being included in the two groups, different laser equipment was used to revascularize the lower limbs. The patients' revascularization status was evaluated through regular follow-up after surgery.
Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGresidual diameter stenosis
Reduction from baseline in residual diameter stenosis (measured in percent), prior to any adjunctive therapy, achieved by the laser catheter, as assessed quantitatively by the core laboratory based upon the procedure angiograms.
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months after surgery
Secondary effectiveness evaluating indicator:1)Primary patency rate
Proportion of patients with residual vessel diameter greater than 30% within 1 month and 6 months
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months after surgery
Secondary effectiveness evaluating indicator:2)Revascularization rate of target vessels
Proportion of patients requiring reoperation for revascularization within 1 month and 6 months due to recurrence or worsening of symptoms caused by the original diseased vessel
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months after surgery
Secondary effectiveness evaluating indicator:3)Rutherford grade
Rutherford classification can effectively evaluate the blood supply of patients' lower limbs
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months after surgery
Secondary effectiveness evaluating indicator:4)Ankle-brachial index
Ankle-brachial index is generally the ratio of ankle systolic blood pressure to brachial artery systolic blood pressure. Ankle-brachial index is a test method to objectively determine the severity of limb ischemia
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months after surgery
Secondary effectiveness evaluating indicator:5)Instrument performance evaluation
Differences in the ablation effects of cold laser and excimer laser on lesions of different nature (thrombus, calcified plaque)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1 month
safety evaluating indicator:1) Major Adverse Event (MAE)
Including limb amputation and death due to inversion of diseased blood vessels
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months after surgery
safety evaluating indicator:2)Device-associated composite endpoint (Do CE)
Intraoperative device-induced distal embolization or postoperative vascular occlusion
Time frame: 1 month
safety evaluating indicator:3)Adverse events / Serious adverse events (AE / SAE)
Adverse events of perforation, dissection, and postoperative hematoma
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months after surgery
safety evaluating indicator:4)Incidence of device defects
For example, lesions in certain specific parts cannot be completely removed, etc.
Time frame: 1 month