People with lower extremity amputation (LEA) have persistent problems with balance, falls, residual limb pain, functional mobility, cognitive attention during gait, and satisfaction with participation in daily activities, despite using prostheses. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to advance understanding of how dynamic foot design features may help people with LEA This study will include people with above-knee amputations, or with bilateral amputations, or with below-knee amputations and lower levels of mobility. The main study questions/goals are: 1a) To determine if frontal plane adaptation in a foot prosthesis impacts performance, comfort, activities of daily living, and community mobility in the study populations. To answer this question, we will compare a locked and unlocked version of the novel prosthesis. 1b) To determine how the unlocked investigational foot condition compares to the person's usual foot using the outcomes listed above. 2\) To examine the participants' lived experience during community activities. The study will use performance tests, questionnaires, logbooks, and interviews to monitor person-centered outcomes and perceptions of personal functioning during the use of the investigational foot (locked and unlocked) compared to the person's usual foot.
The study design is a randomized cross-over clinical trial design (B1 and B2 phases) comparing a carbon fiber foot that includes a functional, unlocked frontal plane adaptable linkage compared to the same foot with the linkage locked to prevent frontal plane motion. With the linkage locked, the foot is comparable to energy storage and return of a carbon fiber foot. The secondary aim for this clinical trial compares the unlocked foot to the participant's usual foot (A1 and A2 phases), representative of the usual standard of care. The testing will be conducted following an A1-B1-B2-A2 design. The A conditions are focused on the participant's usual prosthetic foot. The B conditions are focused on locked and unlocked frontal plane adaptable linkages with the order randomized. Block randomization, stratified by study site, will be used to determine the order participants receive the locked and unlocked prosthetic. In our recent clinical trial, we developed a simple pin system to prevent the linkage from rotating. A1 represents Visit 1, where demographic data are entered. As well, baseline questionnaires and performance data are collected. The participant will become familiar with the online data gathering systems. Then, the participant will be fitted with the adaptable foot by a licensed prosthetist. The linkage will be either locked or unlocked depending on the randomization. People with bilateral amputations will receive symmetrical prostheses. During the \~2-week B1 phase, the participant will perform their normal community activities and contribute usage data, performance ratings, and qualitative data via the online logbook. There is the possibility that the decision may be made to re-fit the participant with a different stiffness of the study foot/feet that will be better suited. If this happens, the at-home use period of participation will be extended for another 2- to 4 weeks. At the end of the B1 phase, participants will complete standardized questionnaires and performance tests at Visit 2. Then, the linkage will be either locked or unlocked depending on the B1 randomization. The \~2-week B2 phase will allow the participant to continue community activities and complete online logbooks. At the finish of the B2 phase, questionnaires and performance tests will be completed at Visit 3. A semi-structured interview will occur to compare the locked and unlocked versions. The purpose of the second \~2-week A2 phase is for the participant to reflect on differences between the adaptable foot and the usual foot after having experiences with the adaptable linkage in the unlocked configuration. Questionnaires and an interview will occur at the final participant session, Visit 4. Questionnaires: The demographic survey, online questionnaires, and activity logbooks will be developed in REDCap and administered either online or on paper, depending on the participant's preferences. Unique URL invitations are sent to participants via email, and reminders are sent if there is a delay in data entry. Data are collected in a database format for analysis. Demographic questions cover age, gender, date of amputation, number of prosthetic feet, description of the usual foot (feet), walking aids, overall health rating, fall history, occupation (if working), physical activity, comorbidities, amputation etiology, veteran status, employment status, education level, race, and ethnicity. The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M™) The PLUS-M 12-item questionnaire examines the difficulty of typical everyday mobility activities on a 5-point Likert scale. Logbooks: Participants will complete daily structured logbooks. Daily logbooks will capture information about prosthetic use (which prosthesis was worn, length of time worn), any falls, residual limb/bodily pain, and provide an opportunity to make notes about any activities that were noticeably impacted by the prosthetic foot. There will be opportunities for participants to provide information about challenging situations and social interaction using scales and open-ended questions. Participants will be encouraged to provide descriptions of activities, including strengths and limitations of foot performance, and to address ADL that might be associated with secondary conditions such as pain, poor balance, safety, fear of falling, attention to foot placement, bilateral activities, surfaces, and uneven ground. Logbooks will be developed in REDCap and can be completed online or on paper. Logbook data will inform the content of the interviews. Semi-structured Interviews: There will be interviews after research phases B2 (innovative foot) and A2 (usual foot). These interviews will clarify significant events documented in the logbooks. The focus of interviews will be on gathering information about the participants' experience using different prosthetic feet, with an emphasis on identifying activities that are facilitated or hindered by the functioning of the prosthetic foot. Interviews will be audio recorded for transcription and analysis. Physical performance tests Forward walking (10-meter walk test) Forward walking at a self-selected speed is a basic test of mobility and is correlated to community function. Spatiotemporal variables during this test will be measured using an instrumented Zeno Walkway. The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) For the TUG, the participant, starts sitting in a chair and, on the command "go," rises, walks 3 meters, turns 180 degrees, returns to the chair, and sits down. There is typically one practice and one test. This is a timed test. In addition to total time, spatiotemporal variables during the TUG will be collected using an instrumented Zeno Walkway. The Three Times Figure of Eight Walk Test (3XF8W) The 3XF8W involves significant turning requirements for the participant. The test was developed to represent walking skills used in everyday life, involving straight and curved paths in both right and left directions. Subjects will begin the task standing between the 2 cones 1.52 m apart. The subject will walk a figure 8 course 3 times for each condition at their self-selected pace and stop when they return to the start position. The outcomes of the test are the time to complete the course and the number of steps taken. Four-square step test (FSST) The FSST is a complex stepping sequence. The participant is instructed to "Try to complete the sequence as fast as possible without touching the sticks. Both feet must contact the floor in each square. If possible, face forward during the entire sequence." The performance tests are ordered in increasing complexity and challenge for people with lower levels of mobility. The FSST combines side-step in both directions, as well as forward and backward stepping. Spatiotemporal variables during this test will also be collected on an instrumented Zeno Walkway.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
96
Participants are provided with the META-Arc from WIllowWood Global, and a locking mechanism prevents side-to-side motion.
Participants are provided with the META-Arc from WIllowWood Global allowing side-to-side motion.
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGWillowWood Global
Mount Sterling, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
RECRUITING10-Meter Walk Test
Forward walking for 10 meters at a self-selected speed.
Time frame: After 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 1 (B1), after 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 2 (B2) after return to usual foot for 2 weeks (A2).
Timed Up and Go Test
The Timed Up and Go Test starts with participant sitting in a chair. On the command "go," the individual will get up and walk 3 meters, turn 180 degrees to walk back the way they came, return to the chair, and sit down. There is one practice and one test.
Time frame: After 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 1 (B1), after 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 2 (B2) after return to usual foot for 2 weeks (A2).
Figure-of-8 Walk Test
For the Figure-of-8 Walk Test the participant will walk at their own pace three times in a figure-of-8 pattern around two cones placed 5 feet apart. They will have the opportunity to practice, and then the test will be repeated three times.
Time frame: After 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 1 (B1), after 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 2 (B2) after return to usual foot for 2 weeks (A2).
The Four-square Step Test (FSST)
The Four-square Step Test (FSST) involves stepping sideways, backwards, and forward following a pattern.
Time frame: After 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 1 (B1), after 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 2 (B2) after return to usual foot for 2 weeks (A2).
The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M™)
The PLUS-M 12-item questionnaire examines typical everyday mobility activities on a 5-point Likert scale.
Time frame: After 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 1 (B1), after 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 2 (B2) after return to usual foot for 2 weeks (A2).
Spatiotemporal parameters of gait
Degree of asymmetry: Percent difference
Time frame: After 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 1 (B1), after 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 2 (B2) after return to usual foot for 2 weeks (A2).
Spatiotemporal parameters of gait
Step width: meters
Time frame: After 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 1 (B1), after 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 2 (B2) after return to usual foot for 2 weeks (A2).
Spatiotemporal parameters of gait
Step length: meters
Time frame: After 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 1 (B1), after 2-week trial of investigational foot Condition 2 (B2) after return to usual foot for 2 weeks (A2).
Daily Activity Logbook: Balance Confidence
Self-reported confidence in balance on a 0-100 scale (higher scores indicate greater confidence).
Time frame: Average of daily logbook across the 2-week trial of each investigational foot condition.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.