This study investigates the benefits of using telehealth services, specifically a combination of music therapy and social work support, to improve the well-being of older adults. Investigators are focusing on outcomes such as reduced loneliness, improved cognition, and how well older adults with and without dementia perceive the quality of the services received. This research is crucial because as the population ages and conditions like Alzheimer's become more prevalent, effective psychosocial interventions are needed. The collaborative telehealth approach of the intervention in this study strives to connect older adults to community and health-related services. Older adults experience challenges in accessing services related to transportation, social support, and finances. While the pandemic prompted a rapid shift of healthcare services online, including music therapy and social work, questions remain about the quality of this transition, especially for older adults who may not be familiar with or have the resources for telehealth. In this pilot study, investigators are studying music therapy and social work support through telehealth to understand how this approach can impact the well-being, cognition, and service quality for older adults, both with and without dementia. Social workers, who focus on improving well-being and addressing various needs, can leverage the therapeutic relationship built by music therapists to better identify and meet service needs. This pilot study builds on a feasibility project, which indicated that this collaborative framework is acceptable, valuable, and of interest to older adults, facilitating remote community connection. Through this research, investigators aim to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth services for older adults to inform a future larger trial.
The goal of this quantitative pilot study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative music therapy and social work telehealth framework for community-dwelling older adults with and without dementia with regards to their emotions, well-being, cognition, and perceived service quality. This pilot study builds on a feasibility study that field tested logistics and provided proof-of-concept of the novel telehealth framework. Specifically, the feasibility study evaluated the acceptability, barriers, and facilitators of this framework for older adults with and without dementia. Both music-based interventions were grounded in the person-centered Clinical Practice Model for Persons with Dementia, which provides guidelines for adjusting the degree of support and challenge offered to an individual. The investigators developed a collaborative social work referral worksheet. The investigators conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with participants and care partners, who offered input about all aspects of the study. The investigators also refined recruitment, data collection, protocol training, and intervention processes. This pilot study builds on this past feasibility work. Older adults often experience changes in health, finances, and social support which impede community involvement. Social distancing surrounding COVID-19 exacerbated such hurdles and enhanced risk for loneliness, depression, and cognitive decline. Although many services including music therapy and social work transitioned from in-person to telehealth during the pandemic, the rapid shift suggests that innovation occurred reactively, without sufficient time to evaluate the quality or effectiveness of this service delivery model. Telehealth is likely to continue to be a component of the music therapy profession and more broadly in healthcare. With thoughtful and systematic development to bridge the digital divide, telehealth may offer some benefit to community-dwelling older adults. This goal may be accomplished through interprofessional collaboration. Music therapists can address psychosocial needs through a variety of flexible and age-appropriate music experiences, while social workers have expertise to reach isolated individuals and connect them to appropriate supports. This pilot study advances a line of research to test a novel telehealth framework that integrates social work and music therapy to promote older adult well-being. In this quantitative pilot study, the investigators will test methods and procedures that will be used in a future larger clinical trial to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of this research. The objectives of this pilot study are to examine the effects of the collaborative telehealth framework on older adults' well-being (primary aim), cognition, loneliness, perception of service quality, and (in response to music therapy) emotions, and to gather preliminary data for effect size estimation. Participants and interventionists will be invited to engage in a semi-structured qualitative interview at the conclusion of the study to inform further optimization of the collaborative telehealth framework. Participants have the option to use their own or borrow equipment (iPads). To reach those with limited resources, there will be 2 iPads with cellular data available to ship to enable study participation. Participants will be community-dwelling older adults with and without dementia. All participants will receive music therapy via telehealth and social work wellness sessions via telehealth. Collaboration is the key difference in the levels of independent variable: participants will be randomly assigned to either a collaborative condition, or non-collaborative condition. In the collaborative condition, information collected during music therapy will inform social work wellness sessions following a protocol developed during the feasibility study. In the non-collaborative condition, social workers and music therapists will operate telehealth services independently.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
20
Music Therapy: delivered via Zoom by a board-certified music therapist (MT-BC) 30-min 2x/week for 4 weeks (8 sessions total); follows the Clinical Practice Model, which guides customizations of various music experiences (e.g., singing, songwriting, movement, relaxation, lyric discussion, improvisation, instrument play, etc.) per participants' strengths, interests, preferences, culture, and momentary responses. Each participant works with the same MT-BC throughout the study.
Social Work: delivered via Zoom by a licensed social worker (SW) or supervised SW graduate student 3x for 30-min: 1) after 2 weeks MT (assessment), 2) after 4 weeks MT (service referral), 3) 2-week follow-up. SWs operate independently from MT-BCs to identify possible participant service referral needs using the Aging and Memory Quality of Life Survey (AMQoL), baseline data, SW session interactions, and SW Referral Worksheet. Each participant works with the same SW throughout the study.
Social Work: delivered via Zoom by a licensed SW or supervised SW graduate student 3x for 30-min: 1) after 2 weeks MT (assessment), 2) after 4 weeks MT (service referral), 3) 2-week follow-up. In addition to the AMQoL, baseline data, SW session interactions, and the SW Referral Worksheet, SWs collaborate fully with MT-BCs, have full access MT session notes, and can discuss participants' needs with MT-BC to identify possible participant service referral needs. Each participant works with the same SW throughout the study.
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Saint Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Mean Change from Baseline in World Health Organization-5 (WHO-5) Well-Being Index at 6 Weeks
A simple 5-item measure of subjective well-being (a combination of feeling good and functioning well). The participant rates each item on a 6-point scale from 0 (at no time) to 5 (all of the time); total raw score ranges from 0 (worst possible) to 25 (best possible well-being); percentage score (raw X 4) ranges from 0 (worst possible) to 100 (best possible well-being). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Time frame: Enrollment, end of Week 6.
Mean Change from Baseline in WHO-5 Well-Being Index at 8 Weeks
A simple 5-item measure of subjective well-being (a combination of feeling good and functioning well). The participant rates each item on a 6-point scale from 0 (at no time) to 5 (all of the time); total raw score ranges from 0 (worst possible) to 25 (best possible well-being); percentage score (raw X 4) ranges from 0 (worst possible) to 100 (best possible well-being). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Time frame: Enrollment, end of Week 8.
Mean Change in Self-Reported Feelings for Participants with Dementia
Administered by music therapists. For participants who score less than 18 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): The Dementia Mood Picture Test (DMPT) measures self-reported feelings of persons with mild, moderate, or severe dementia using simple, enlarged face drawings with verbal descriptors for 6 emotions: good mood, bad mood, happy, sad, angry, and worried. The person with dementia rates each emotion on a 3-point scale from 0 (do not feel that emotion) to 2 (feel that emotion a lot); total score ranges from 0 (most negative) to 12 (most positive; with negative valence emotions reverse-scored).
Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after each music therapy session.
Mean Change in Self-Reported Feelings for Participants without Dementia
Administered by music therapists. For participants who score 18 or greater on the MoCA: analogous Likert-type scale for the same 6 DMPT items: good mood, bad mood, happy, sad, angry, and worried, scored from 0 (do not feel that emotion) to 6 (feel that emotion a lot); total score ranges from 0 (most negative) to 36 (most positive).
Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after each music therapy session.
Mean Change from Baseline in University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale at 6 Weeks
The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) is a 20-item scale designed to measure subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Participants rate each item on a 4-point scale from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often). Total score ranges from 20 (lower loneliness) to 80 (higher loneliness). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Time frame: Enrollment, end of Week 6.
Mean Change from Baseline in UCLA Loneliness Scale at 8 Weeks
The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) is a 20-item scale designed to measure subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Participants rate each item on a 4-point scale from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often). Total score ranges from 20 (lower loneliness) to 80 (higher loneliness). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Time frame: Enrollment, end of Week 8.
Mean Change from Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at 6 Weeks
Cognitive screening tool with scores ranging from 0 (greatly impaired) to 30 (unimpaired). The researchers will use the Audio-Visual Conference version as a brief estimate of change in cognitive status over the course of the study. Those who score less than 18 will be labeled as "with dementia" for the purposes of random assignment, and the researchers will use the following descriptive severity categories: \> 25 = no impairment, 18-25 = mild impairment, 10-17= moderate impairment, \< 10 = severe impairment. Administered by outcome assessor by Zoom.
Time frame: Enrollment, end of Week 6.
Program Evaluation Total Score
The researchers will use a 12-item Quality Questionnaire concerning quality, willingness to try, and helpfulness of music therapy, social work, telehealth, and the overall program. Each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Poor/extremely unwilling/extremely unhelpful) to 5 (Excellent/extremely willing/extremely helpful). Total score ranges from 12 (worst) to 60 (best). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Time frame: Within 1 week of final social work session.
Program Evaluation Quality Score
The researchers will analyze 4 quality items from the Quality Questionnaire concerning quality of music therapy, quality of social work, quality of telehealth, and quality of the overall program. Each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent). Total score for quality ranges from 4 (poorest quality) to 20 (best quality). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Time frame: Within 1 week of final social work session.
Program Evaluation Willingness Score
The researchers will analyze 4 quality items from the Quality Questionnaire concerning willingness to try music therapy, social work, telehealth, and the overall program in the future. Each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (extremely unwilling) to 5 (extremely willing). Total score for willingness ranges from 4 (most unwilling) to 20 (most willing). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Time frame: Within 1 week of final social work session.
Program Evaluation Helpfulness Score
The researchers will analyze 4 quality items from the Quality Questionnaire concerning helpfulness of music therapy, social work, telehealth, and the overall program. Each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (extremely unhelpful) to 5 (extremely helpful). Total score for helpfulness ranges from 4 (most unhelpful) to 20 (most helpful). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Time frame: Within 1 week of final social work session.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.