Prostate cancer (PCa) is currently the most common cancer in men in Finland (www.cancerregistry.fi). Although prognosis is very good in majority of men, it is noteworthy that still up to 20% of PCa cases are metastatic at the time of initial diagnosis and yearly 900 men die because of prostate cancer. Robust primary staging is, therefore, one of the most important prognostic factors, and it is crucial for treatment decision. Despite their low sensitivity to detect metastasis, bone scintigraphy (BS) and contrast enhanced whole body computed tomography (ce-wbCT) are recommended by current guidelines for primary staging in men at risk of metastasis. MIP-1404 is a small-molecule PSMA inhibitor that can be used in SPECT systems (99mTc-MIP- 1404 SPECT/CT). 99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT is performed by a single IV bolus of 99mTc-MIP-1404, which binds with high affinity to extracellular domain of PSMA molecule. As of March 2020, a total of 629 subjects have received 99mTc-MIP-1404 injection averaging 740 ±111 MBq (20 ± 3 mCi) per administration in prospective clinical trials. 99mTc MIP-1404 has been well tolerated following a single IV dose at 740 ± 111 MBq in both healthy volunteers and patients with confirmed metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma. In prospective and retrospective studies, it has shown high potential to detect prostate cancer lesions in primary staging. In fact, Goffin et al. reported a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 87% detecting local lymph node metastasis in radically operated patients when histopathology was used as a reference. This corresponds closely to the sensitivity of PSMA-PET. PROSTAMIP is a randomized prospective single-institutional study to demonstrate superiority of 99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT compared to traditional imaging modalities (99mTc-HMDP planar BS plus ce-wbCT).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
320
Subjects undergo additional imaging i.e. PSMA/SPECT/CT and PSMA/PET/CT
University Hospital of Turku, Hospital Distric of Southwest Finland
Turku, Southwest Finland, Finland
RECRUITINGNumber of subjects with local lymph node metastasi(e)s
Superiority of experimental arm (99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT) in detecting subjects with local lymph node metastasi(e)s compared to control arm (ce-wbCT)
Time frame: Baseline
Number of subjects with metastasis
Comparison of detection of metastatic subjects (local lymph node metastasis and/ or distant metastasis) in experimental arm (99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT) and in control arm (a combination of 99mTc-HMDP planar bone scintigraphy and contract enhanced CT)
Time frame: Baseline
Diagnostic accuracy of detecting subjects with metastasis between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging (a combination of 99mTc-HMDP planar BS and ce-wbCT) in detection of metastatic subjects (a combination of nodal and distant metastasis)
Time frame: Baseline
True positive rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging
Description of true positive rate of metastatic lesions between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging (a combination of 99mTc-HMDP planar bone scintigraphy and contrast enhanced)
Time frame: Baseline
False positive rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging
Description of false positive rate of metastatic lesions between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging (a combination of 99mTc-HMDP planar bone scintigraphy and contrast enhanced)
Time frame: Baseline
False negative rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging
Description of false negative rate of metastatic lesions between PSMA-SPECT/CT and conventional imaging (a combination of 99mTc-HMDP planar bone scintigraphy and contrast enhanced)
Time frame: Baseline
Diagnostic accuracy of detecting subjects with metastasis between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT in detection of metastatic subjects (a combination of nodal and distant metastasis)
Time frame: Baseline
True positive rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT
Description of true positive rate of metastatic lesions between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT
Time frame: Baseline
False positive rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT
Description of false positive rate of metastatic lesions between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT
Time frame: Baseline
False negative rate in lesion level between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT
Description of false negative rate of metastatic lesions between PSMA-SPECT/CT and PSMA-PET/CT
Time frame: Baseline
Inter-rater agreement
Cohen´s Kappa value between the two readers in each imaging modality
Time frame: Baseline
Effect on treatment decision
The number and proportion of subjects in which treatment recommendation was changed due to 99mTc-MIP 1404 SPECT/CT or 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.