This is a randomized controlled feasibility trial conducted on patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and their significant other
The trial will be conducted on 60 dyads, each comprising a CKD patient and a significant other, who will be randomly assigned into two groups. The intervention group will receive the Digital Dyadic Empowerment Program (DDEP) while the control group will receive routine education and care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
120
The Digital Dyadic Empowerment Intervention utilizes LINE, a prominent instant messaging App in Taiwan, integrated with an extended application to deliver comprehensive lifestyle modification support to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) dyads. Key features of this intervention include: 1. Access to CKD Health Education Information; 2. Supportive Information for Significant Others; 3. Physiological Values Logging for Self-Monitoring; 4. Reminders for Clinical Appointments and Daily Self-Management Tasks; 5. Kidney Health Diary for Lifestyle Modification Progress Tracking; 6. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and Consultation with Healthcare Providers. This intervention aims to enhance the overall well-being of CKD dyads by promoting education, self-monitoring, adherence to appointments, and efficient communication with healthcare providers.
National Cheng Kung University
Tainan, Taiwan
Change From Baseline in eGFR at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
For each patient, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) by the IDMS-MDRD Equation at 3 months was obtained through the patient's biochemical test reports. Higher eGFR numbers generally indicate better kidney functions.
Time frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in CKD Stage at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
For each patient, the change from Baseline in CKD stage at 3 months was obtained by comparing the CKD stage at baseline and at follow-up, converted into the following three categories: (1) recover (e.g., from Stage 3a \[at baseline\] to Stage 2 \[at follow-up\]); (2) stable (e.g., remaining Stage 3a at both baseline and follow-up); and (3) progress (e.g., from Stage 3a \[at baseline\] to Stage 3b \[at follow-up\]).
Time frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in TTM Stage at 3 Months
For each dyad, change from Baseline in TTM stage at 3 months was obtained by comparing the TTM stage of change at baseline and at follow-up, converted into the following three categories: (1) regress (e.g., from Preparation \[at baseline\] to Contemplation \[at follow-up\]); (2) maintain (e.g., remaining Action at both baseline and follow-up); and (3) advance (e.g., from Action \[at baseline\] to Maintanece \[at follow-up\]).
Time frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in Health Promoting Lifestyle at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
For each patient, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in patient's Health Promoting Lifestyle at 3 months was assessed using the Chinese version of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II (HPLP-II), a validated scale with 52 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The total scores range from 52 to 208, with higher scores indicate better health-promoting behavior.
Time frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life at 3 Months
For each participant, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in Quality of Life at 3 months was assessed using the first item of the Taiwanese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). The item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in Adherence to Health Behaviors at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
For each patient, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in patient's adherence to healthy behaviors was measured using the Adherence to Healthy Behaviors Scale (AHBS). The scale includes 13 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate better adherence.
Time frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in Helping Relationships From Significant Others at 3 Months (Patient-specific)
For each patient, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in patient's Helping Relationships from Significant Others at 3 months was assessed using the Chinese version of the Helping Relationships from Significant Others Scale (HRSO).The scale consists of 15 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 15 to 105. Higher scores indicate better support from the significant other.
Time frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention
Change From Baseline in Dyadic Adjustment at 3 Months
For each participant, change from Baseline (Followup score - Baseline score) in Dyadic Adjustment at 3 months was assessed using the 7-item Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS-7). The first six items are rated on a 6-point scale, while the seventh item is rated on a 7-point scale. The total scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating better relationship quality.
Time frame: Before initial intervention and 3 months after initial intervention