Migraine, a chronic intermittent headache disorder, ranks in the top five causes of years lived with disability. One promising non-pharmacologic and integrative treatment for migraine may be chiropractic care due to the co-occurrence of migraine and musculoskeletal complaints. The goal of this application is to perform a pilot study of chiropractic care for episodic migraine to help inform the design of a future, full-scale pragmatic effectiveness trial.
Migraine, a chronic intermittent headache disorder, ranks in the top five causes for years lived with disability. Due to the high disability burden associated with migraine, individuals who experience migraine often seek treatments to reduce the frequency and severity of their attacks and often express interest in nonpharmacologic and integrative approaches. One promising treatment may be chiropractic care due to the comorbidity of migraine and musculoskeletal complaints. Our long-term goal is to conduct a multi-site large-scale, fully powered trial evaluating the effectiveness of a validated multimodal chiropractic care intervention to reduce migraine frequency, severity, and disability. To help inform the design of a large-scale trial with both pragmatic and explanatory features, we propose to conduct a two-arm pilot randomized attention-controlled trial at two sites which are representative of sites to be included in the future large-scale trial. We will recruit and randomize 60 individuals (30 per site) to either 1) 14 visits of chiropractic care (CC) (6 visits of CC over 3-5 weeks followed by 8 visits of CC over 12 weeks); or 2) 14 sessions of headache health education (15-minute 1:1 virtual sessions focused on pre-defined migraine specific topics) - both added to usual medical care. This study will allow us to address the following aims: 1) To train a team of chiropractors from established clinics within two academic medical centers with existing partnerships with headache programs, refine our intervention, and assess the fidelity of intervention protocols; 2) To optimize data collection, data management, and reporting procedures across sites and establish the infrastructure needed for a large-scale trial; 3) To assess the feasibility of recruitment, retention, and adherence across multiple study sites; 4) To assess participant expectations and treatment experience.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
60
The chiropractic care protocol can be personalized to the patient's clinical needs and follows the scope of chiropractic care practice in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the State of Connecticut. Components of the chiropractic intervention include: posture correction / spinal stabilization exercises; soft tissue relaxation techniques; spinal manipulation (i.e. chiropractic adjustment) / mobilization; breathing and relaxation techniques; stretches, self-care; ergonomic modifications; bracing and supports.
Participants randomized to the HHE arm will receive 14 interactive 15-minute education sessions delivered via video conference. To partially control for attention and expectation associated with chiropractic care, participants randomized to the control group will receive a modified version of a headache education intervention we employed in our pilot study. Participants randomized to HHE will receive 14 interactive 15-minute education sessions delivered via VA or MGB Teams. Material to be covered will focus on pre-defined migraine-specific topics, compared with the control for our pilot study, in addition to greater contact time, HHE will be delivered in a more interactive manner utilizing active learning principles known to support adult learning. We will also utilize publicly available short videos (e.g., from the American Headache Society) followed by scripted discussions with the participant. Example topics include the physiology of migraine or the contribution of life.
Osher Center for Integrative Health, Mass General Brigham
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGRecruitment feasibility (average number of participants per month)
Each site will be able to recruit 30 participants within 16 months
Time frame: 16 months
Retention feasibility (proportion of participants not lost to follow-up)
Retention will be quantified by the proportion of subjects who record their migraines for at least 26 out of 28 days and all questionnaires at each outcome assessment.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Intervention adherence feasibility
Adherence will be calculated as the proportion of subjects who attend at least 80% of the chiropractic care visits or 80% of the one-on-one headache health education video-conferences.
Time frame: 15 weeks
Number of days with migraine headaches
Number of migraine headaches as recorded in migraine diaries.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
Proportion of responders
Proportion of individuals who experience a ≥50% reduction in migraine days.
Time frame: Change from baseline to initial follow-up (16 weeks) and change from baseline to final follow-up (20 weeks).
Average severity of migraine attacks
Average severity of migraine attacks (on a 1 to 10 scale) as recorded in migraine diaries.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Average number of hours for a migraine attack (duration)
Average number of hours a migraine attack lasted as recorded in migraine diaries.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
Average number of medications used for a migraine attack
Average number of medications used to treat a migraine attack as recorded in migraine diaries
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Self-report questionnaire used to determine how neck pain impacts daily activities of living and self-related neck pain disability. Score range: 10 - 60. Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
Headache Related Disability (HIT-6)
HIT-6 is a validated 6-item assessment that evaluates the impact headaches have on a participant's life. Score range: 36 - 78. Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, version 2.1 (MSQv2.1)
Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, version 2.1 (MSQv2.1) is a validated 14-item questionnaire; it is one of the most frequently used disability instrument in migraine research and is highly reliable. Participants are asked to provide their response to each question using a standard six point Likert-type scale (none of the time; a little bit of the time; some of the time; a good bit of the time; most of the time; all of the time). Each MSQoL v.2.1 dimension is scored independently from 0 to 100 such that a higher score indicates a better quality of life.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
PROMIS-29 is a system of validated, highly reliable, precise measures of patient-reported health status for physical, mental, and social well-being. PROMIS-29 v2. 0 profile measure assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items for each domain.The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
20-item self-report measure of the DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. Score range: 0 - 5. Higher scores are associated with greater likelihood of PTSD.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)
Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire will be used to measure the amount and intensity of general exercise during the study period. This validated instrument consists of 4 items measuring the frequency of light, moderate, and vigorous-intensity leisure-time physical activity. In the GLTEQ, individuals are asked to complete a self-explanatory, brief four-item query of usual leisure-time exercise habits. Higher score indicate more leisure-time exercise per week.
Time frame: Assess during three 4-week periods (baseline, initial follow-up, final follow-up) within the total of 24 weeks that participants are enrolled in the trial.
The Expectations for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Treatments Questionnaire short form (EXPECT)
EXPECT Questionnaire (short form) is a recently developed and validated questionnaire used to assess individuals' expectations of treatments for chronic pain. Score range: 0 - 40. Higher scores indicate higher expectation of recovery after treatment.
Time frame: Assess only at baseline following the 4 weeks run-in phase but before randomization.