To compare 2 different models for prescribing opioid pain medication to provide better pain control to participants with an abdominal cancer who are having surgery.
Primary Objectives: The co-primary objectives of this study are as follows: 1\. To determine differences in the initial OME prescribed upon discharge between each algorithm/model. 1\. To determine OME usage by day 14 after hospital discharge. Secondary Objectives: Secondary objectives are as follows: 1. To determine rates of patients with zero OME upon discharge. 2. To determine rates of OME refill requests and completions at 15- and 30-days post-operation. 3. To determine number of unused or leftover pills at 15- and 30-days post- operation 4. To determine persistent opioid use at 30-days, 3-months, and 6-months post-operation 5. To elucidate patient, prescriber, and oncologic factors predictive of persistent opioid use 6. To assess quality of life using patient-reported outcomes at 30-days, 3-months, and 6-months post-operation. 7. To determine patient satisfaction with either prescribing model.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
170
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Safety and adverse events (AEs)
Incidence of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version (v) 5.0
Time frame: Through study completion; an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.