The central venous catheter (CVC) is commonly used in intensive care unit (ICU). The primary complications associated with CVCs especially with prolonged use include thrombosis and infections. Hence, it is essential to remove the CVC as soon as it becomes unnecessary. Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) on a critically ill patient can be a significant challenge for nurses. After several days in ICU, patients may develop significant edema in the upper limbs, complicating the PIVC. Near-infrared light devices (NILD) are medical devices that use near-infrared light to highlight the patient's peripheral venous network directly on their skin. The advantage of this device is its minimal training and ease of use for effective application. Nurses can use this medical device without specific conditions once they have received training on its use. The vein illuminator has not been extensively studied in ICU. This study aims to compare two techniques for PIVC in critically ill patients with existing CVC for whom maintaining the deep venous access is no longer indicated. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the NILD would increase the success rate of first-attempt PIVC insertion compared to a landmark approach (traditional method) for PIVC in ICU.
This is a multicenter randomized controlled study. 380 patients will be randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to landmark approach (standard group) or near-infrared light device (interventional group). Randomization will be done immediately after the enrollment of the patient. Randomization will be stratified by center and according to anticipated difficult venous access defined by: * BMI \> 30 Kg/m2 * Increase in body weight between admission and day of inclusion \> 10%. * Clinically evident edema of the upper limbs (with pitting) * Absence of visible or palpable veins on arms and forearms If one or more items are present, the patient is classified as difficult to venous access. Once the patient has been enrolled and randomized, the nurse in charge of the patient performs the PIVC according to the randomization group as soon as possible after randomization. The nurse will have a maximum of 3 attempts before handing over to another nurse. The total number of attempts will be 5 with the allocated method (traditional method or NILD). In the case of failure after 5 initial attempts, the intervention will be considered as a failure. However, a maximum of 5 additional attempts will be allowed with any method on the day of randomization. The success or failure of PIVC will be recorded, as well as the device used. The attempts should be performed within 6 hours after randomization. If one of the 5 first initial attempts is successful, the study continues until the PIVC is removed (max 7 days according to recommendations) or patient discharge, whichever comes first, in order to evaluate the occurrence of local complications.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
380
Nurses will have to find the vein for the PIVC using the near-infrared light device.
CH de Chartres
Chartres, France
CH Le Mans
Le Mans, France
CHU Orléans
Orléans, France
CHU de Tours
Tours, France
Success rate on the first attempt of PIVC in ICU using NILD
To show that the use of the NILD improves the success rate on the first attempt of PIVC in ICU for patients for whom the use of a deep venous catheter is no longer justified. The success of PIVC will be determined by the presence of venous return during catheterization in the reflux chamber, the full catheter introduction, and the administration of a 10cc syringe of isotonic solution (NaCl 0.9%) with a flash without extravasation. A puncture attempt is defined by the effraction of the skin barrier by the device. During a puncture, repositioning/change of catheter direction is permitted. Peripheral intravenous puncture will be performed by nurses only.
Time frame: Baseline
number of attempts before successful PIVC
Compare the number of attempts before successful PIVC between the traditional method (standard group) and the use of NILD (interventional group). The number of puncture attempts will be defined by the number of attempts between inclusion and successful of PIVC (last attempt included). On the day of inclusion in the study, each nurse has a maximum of three attempts at PIVC, per patient, depending on the randomization arm. The maximum number of initial attempts per patient is 5.
Time frame: Baseline
occurrence of local complications
Compare the occurrence of local complications (phlebitis, extravasation) between the two groups in patients for whom PIVC is considered successful. \- The occurrence and type of local complications within 7 days of successful PIVC will be compared between the two groups, as well as their time of occurrence after placement (until removal of the medical device or until discharge from the hospital department). if the patient is discharged before 7 days). The main local complications are venous inflammation and extravasation. Local signs to watch out for include pain, swelling and induration. The presence of any of these signs during daily monitoring will lead to its withdrawal. Only medical confirmation of venous inflammation and extravasation will be recorded for this study.
Time frame: Day 7
success rate of PIVC according to nurses's experience
Compare the success rate of PIVC according to nurses' experience between the two groups. The success rate or PIVC according to nurses-experience between the two groups will be compared by stratification: nurses with less than one year's nursing experience, between 1 to 5 years' experience and more than 5 years.
Time frame: Baseline
success rate of PIVC in patients considered with anticipated difficult intravenous access
Compare the success rate of PIVC in patients considered with anticipated difficult intravenous access between the two groups. \- Anticipated difficult PIVC will be defined as follows: * Presence of upper limb edema * Absence of palpable veins when applying a tourniquet * Obese patient defined as BMI \> 30 kg/m2 * Increase in body weight between admission and day of inclusion \> 10%
Time frame: Baseline
PIVC insertion time
Compare PIVC insertion time between the two groups
Time frame: Baseline
pain levels
Compare pain levels in conscious patients between the two groups using the pain verbal analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 unbearable pain.
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.