Background: Jawline improvement is nowadays a strong patients' demand. Among patients undergoing orthognathic surgery, it remains sometimes a challenge to manage angle definition due to the classic mandibular osteotomy trait which mostly allows sagittal mandibular movements but can't modify the ramus height. A few types of osteotomies can be used to improve jawline's shape while correcting malocclusion, but they remain technically difficult and often imply the necessity for bone grafting and/or the use of a specific saw and screwdriver. The advent of computer-assisted surgical planning and computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques for patient-specific implant (PSI) fabrication has enabled new methods for managing the jawline in orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study was to assess jawline improvement with patient-specific angle implants in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery with standard osteotomies.Methods: A virtual simulation of a Le Fort I osteotomy (if needed), a sagittal split ramus osteotomy with patient-specific titanium angle implants, and a genioplasty (if needed) was conducted on a preoperative three-dimensional (3D) model of each patient's skull using ProPlan CMF software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Computer-assisted osteotomy saw-and-drill guides and patient-specific implants (PSIs, titanium plates and angle implants) were produced and used during the surgery. The investigators chose to focus on jawline improvement by comparing the preoperative and the post-operative 3D-photographs using the VECTRA H2 3D imagine system (Canfield Scientific, \*\*).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
20
CHU de Nice
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
CHU NICE
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
The primary outcome of interest was the postoperative aspect and position of the gonial angle
The primary outcome of interest was the postoperative aspect and position of the gonial angle, assessed by 3D-stereophotogrametry
Time frame: postoperative week 4
Secondary outcome of interest is patients satisfaction
Scale title = échelle de Likert. Maximum score 5 (= not satisfied) / minimum score 1 (= total satisfaction)
Time frame: From post operative week 1 to one year follow-up
Secondary outcome of interest is number and type of complications
Secondary outcome of interest is number and type of complications
Time frame: From post operative week 1 to one year follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.