Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a strategy of perioperative management aimed to accelerate the rehabilitation of patients through various optimized perioperative managements as well as ongoing adherence to a patient-focused, multidisciplinary, and multimodal approach. Alleviating the injury and stress caused by surgery or disease is the core principle of ERAS, which has been shown to reduce complication rates after surgery, promote patient recovery, decrease hospital length of stay and reduce costs. ERAS has been widely applied in many surgical perioperative fields, and it has achieved remarkable effects. However, there are few applications of ERAS in neurosurgery, especially in clinical trials of neurocritical care patients. Therefore, the investigators attempt to conduct the study of ERAS in neurosurgical intensive patients using a series of optimized perioperative managements that have been verified to be effective by evidence-based medicine, and to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ERAS in neurocritical care. The aim of this study is to explore the most suitable ERAS protocols to accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation process of neurocritical care patients, and to provide more evidence-based medicine for the effectiveness and safety of ERAS in neurosurgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
The technologies, processes and measures of enhanced recovery after surgery focus on the following aspects: 1. Early assessment and treatment 2. Optimized anesthetic protocol 3. Reducing surgical stress 4. Multi-modal comprehensive monitoring 5. Comprehensive diagnosis and treatment in neurosurgical intensive care 6. Intensive early rehabilitation treatment
Conventional therapy in neurocritical care.
Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
Shanghai, China
RECRUITINGClinical prognosis
Glasgow Outcome Scale score (1 = death; 2 = persistent vegetative state; 3 = severe disability; 4 = moderate disability; 5 = good but not necessarily complete recovery; unfavorable outcome was defined as score of ≤3, and favorable outcome was defined as a score of \>3)
Time frame: One month, three and six months after injury or attack
Neurological function assessment
Modified Rankin scale score (0 = no symptoms; 1 = no significant disability; 2 = slight disability; 3 = moderate disability; 4 = moderately severe disability; 5 = severe disability; 6 = dead; favorable outcome was defined as score of 0-2, and unfavorable outcome was defined as score of 3-6)
Time frame: One month, three and six months after injury or attack
Neuroimaging evaluation
Computer tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: One week, two weeks after surgery; one month, three and six months after injury or attack
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.