The goal of this prospective, single-arm clinical study is to gather quantifiable data on Renuvion's impact on skin elasticity and hydration, indicators of skin quality and estimate the biological skin age using DNA methylation in males and females between 18 and 75 years of age who plan to receive a lower facelift surgery. The main purpose is to quantify the effect of the Renuvion device on skin elasticity (collagen density, elastin, fibrillin-1), hydration (aquaporin-3, acidic glycosaminoglycans, HA), and DNA methylation to estimate the biological age of the skin. Participants will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System.
The purpose of this study is to gather quantifiable data on Renuvion's impact on skin elasticity and hydration, indicators of skin quality and estimate the biological skin age using DNA methylation. This study is a prospective, single-arm clinical study to be conducted at up to three clinical sites in the US. Up to 10 subjects will be enrolled and treated if they meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and provide written informed consent. Enrolled subjects meeting all entrance criteria and confirmed eligible for study treatment will be asked to participate. Subjects will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System. The mid/upper-face area will not be treated with Renuvion and the lower face/neck area will be treated with Renuvion. Treatment will consist of subdermal coagulation of soft tissue using the Renuvion APR handpiece.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
7
The Apyx Medical Corporation Renuvion/J-Plasma helium plasma family of products has received FDA clearance under 510(k) numbers K191542, K192867 for the cutting, coagulation, and ablation of soft tissue.
LA Plastic Surgery and Dermatology
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Holcomb & Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Analysis of Elasticity (Collagen & Elastin)
To assess Elasticity (collagen \& elastin) evaluation will be based on the qualitative histology in samples at baseline and Day 180 follow-up. Two samples from each time period were analyses - control and treatment area. The H\&E, trichrome, and van Gieson-stained slides were evaluated via light microscopy for any abnormalities and extracellular matrix changes. The results of histopathological assessment were scored using the industry standard 5-point scoring system. 0=Normal, 1=Minimal, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 180
Analyzing Days of Duration for Bruising, Swelling
Analysis days of duration of overall facial bruising and swelling post-treatment through the 180-day visit. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for bruising/swelling.
Time frame: Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180
Percentage of Lower Face Area Healed
Percentage of the lower facial treatment area assessed as healed at each post-treatment time frame (Days 1, 7, 14, 45, 90 \& 180) based on investigator clinical evaluation documented in Case Report Forms. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control untreated mid/upper-face area was not evaluated for healing.
Time frame: Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180
Bleeding
Analysis of bleeding during surgery measured in cubic centimeter. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for bleeding.
Time frame: During Procedure (Day 0)
The Principal Investigator Will Complete a PGAIS Assessing Overall Aesthetic Improvement in the Treatment Area at Day 180 Post-treatment.
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (PGAIS) rating by investigator \[Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse\]. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for GAIS as it was not treated.
Time frame: Day 180
The Subject Will Complete a SGAIS Assessing Overall Aesthetic Improvement in the Treatment Area at Day 180 Post-treatment.
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (SGAIS) rating by subject \[Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse\]. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for GAIS as it was not treated.
Time frame: Day 180
Patient Satisfaction
The subject will complete a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) while referring to their image in a mirror and current post-treatment photos compared to baseline photos to rate how satisfied they are, and if they note any improvement in the treatment area. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for PSQ as it was not treated.
Time frame: Day 180
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.