Ankle sprain is a commonly encountered condition in clinical practice, constituting approximately 15-30% of all musculoskeletal injuries. Long-term studies have demonstrated that up to 73% of patients experience at least one more ankle sprain following an acute ankle sprain. Inadequate treatment of acute ankle instability can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI) in 30-70% of cases. Treatment approaches for CAI are classified into conservative and surgical methods. Typically, conservative treatment is initially employed to address proprioceptive deficits and static impairments. Passive, unidirectional treatments such as injections, electrotherapy, and ice, which do not target muscle strength, kinetic chain, tendon capacity, and cortical control, are reported to be insufficient or ineffective in treating CAI, relying solely on symptomatic relief. Therefore, therapeutic exercises are fundamental in CAI treatment, leading to positive developments in parameters such as strength, dynamic balance, functional status, quality of life, and injury risk. Among the most commonly used exercise approaches are proprioceptive and resistive exercises. Upon reviewing the literature, it is observed that bipedal exercises have been employed from the early stages of CAI. However, due to clinical symptoms such as pain, insecurity, and fear associated with loading the affected limb, patients tend to avoid putting weight on the affected limb, resulting in the frequent use of bipedal exercises in the early phases of rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the effectiveness of unipedal exercise interventions used in the early stages of rehabilitation for individuals with CAI in terms of pain, functional stability, fear avoidance, disease severity, functional performance, balance, and patient satisfaction, in comparison to bipedal exercise interventions.
Voluntary participants who have been diagnosed with chronic ankle instability will be included in the study. Signed voluntary consent will be obtained from participants. Participants will be divided into two groups. The study groups will be as follows: a) early bipedal exercise group, b) late bipedal exercise group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
Proprioceptive, resistive, nuromuscular exercises and stretching; Exercise interventions involving the active use of both extremities will be implemented for the first four weeks.
Proprioceptive, resistive, nuromuscular exercises and stretching; Exercise interventions involving the active use of both extremities will be implemented for the last four weeks.
Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
RECRUITINGVisual Analog Scale
Patients will be asked to use a 100 mm scale to indicate the intensity of ankle pain by marking a point on the scale. As the marked point approaches 100, it will represent an increase in perceived pain intensity. The location marked on the scale closer to 100 will indicate a higher level of perceived pain.
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 months
Single Leg Hop Test
It is an athletic performance test designed to assess the functional stability of patients. In this test, participants are instructed to perform lateral hops as far as possible, and the recorded distance of their jumps serves as a score, reflecting their functional stability.
Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks
Tampa Kinesiophoby Scoring
It is a 17-item scale developed to assess the fear of movement/re-injury.
Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
It is a 30-point, 9-item scale measuring the severity of functional ankle instability. Lower scores indicate functional ankle instability. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for this valid and reliable scale is 3 points.
Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks
Joint Range of Motion Evaluation
During the assessments, three repeat measurements will be made using an electronic goniometer. For goniometric measurement, the pivot point will be placed on the lateral malleolus. The fixed arm will be kept parallel to the lateral midline of the fibula. The moving arm, on the other hand, will follow the lateral midline of the 5th metatarsal bone.
Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
This tool has been developed as a self-report instrument to comprehensively assess physical performance among individuals with various lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders, including leg, foot, and ankle conditions. It consists of 23 questions covering sub-parameters such as activity limitation, disability, and pain. Higher scores on the tool indicate greater impairment and lower function.
Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks
Star Excursion Test
Physical performance that requires strength, flexibility, and proprioception is assessed through a dynamic test evaluating dynamic postural control and lower extremity injury risk associated with musculoskeletal injuries. The protocol of the test involves maintaining balance on the ipsilateral leg while reaching as far as possible with the contralateral leg.
Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks
Single Leg Stance Test
Participants' standing balance will be assessed. Initially, one foot will be positioned on a firm and flat surface with the entire lower extremity in full extension, while the other lower extremity is positioned with the hip and knee flexed at 90 degrees. With their eyes closed, participants will start the timing when the foot not being tested loses contact with the ground, and the timing will stop when they place their foot back on the ground or when there is a significant increase in body sway.
Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks
Global Rating of Change Scale-GRC
It will be used to evaluate patient satisfaction. It is designed to determine the amount of improvement or worsening of the patient over time. In our study, GRC consisting of 5 levels between -2 and +2 value ranges (-2: I am much worse, -1: I am worse, 0: I am the same, 1: I am better, 2: I am much better) was preferred.
Time frame: 2 times for 24 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.