This study aimed to determine the impact on outcomes when recipient veins with reflux were used for LVA for the treatment of unilateral lower limb lymphedema.
The use of recipient veins with reflux for lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is discouraged because of the common belief that it may lead to venous-lymphatic reflux (VLR), a phenomenon in which venous blood is refluxed into the lymphatic lumen after anastomosis, which can lower the long-term patency rate. However, this concept has yet to be validated.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
79
This group included patients who used only recipient veins with reflux
This group included patients who utilized only reflux-free recipient veins
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Volume change after LVA.
The primary endpoint was the volume change at 6/12 months after LVA.
Time frame: 6/12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.