An Open-Label, Non-Randomized Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Leniolisib in Japanese Patients With Activated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Delta Syndrome (APDS) Followed By an Open-Label Long-Term Extension. For the treatment of activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) syndrome (APDS).
This is a 2-part, open-label, non-randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of leniolisib in Japanese patients with APDS. At least3 patients, aged 12 to 75 years (inclusive), will be enrolled. Patient eligibility will be assessed during a 7-week Screening Period (Day -50 to Day -1). This will be followed by a 12-week Treatment Period (Part 1), in which patients will be administered leniolisib doses ranging from 40 to 70 mg twice daily (BID) based on body weight (see dose regimen table below). A Part 1 clinical study report will be generated once the last patient completes the Day 85 Visit for Part 1. Patients who complete the Day 85 Visit will enter the Extension Period of the study (Part 2), in which patients will be administered leniolisib doses ranging from 40 to 70 mg BID (based on body weight) for 1 year or until marketing approval in Japan, whichever is longer. A 4-week Follow-up Period will occur after the last dose of study treatment is received. It is anticipated that a total of 3 patients will be enrolled into the study. Objectives: Part 1: Primary: * To assess the safety and tolerability of leniolisib * To assess the efficacy of leniolisib on lymphoproliferation (sum of product diameters \[SPD\] of index lymph node lesions) and immunophenotype normalization (percentage of naïve B cells out of total B cells) Secondary: * To assess the efficacy of leniolisib on lymphoproliferation (non-index lymph node lesions and spleen) * To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of leniolisib in the Japanese population * To assess the efficacy of leniolisib to modify health-related quality of life * To assess the efficacy of leniolisib by the Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments * To assess the frequency of infections, antibiotic use, and immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy and assessment of impact on other disease-related outcomes (e.g., cytopenia, colitis, and lung function) * To assess biomarkers reflecting the efficacy of leniolisib to reduce systemic inflammatory components of the disease * To assess the treatment benefit to individual patients Part 2: Primary: \- To assess the long-term safety and tolerability of leniolisib Secondary: * To assess the long-term efficacy of leniolisib to modify health-related quality of life * To assess the long-term efficacy of leniolisib on lymphoproliferation (non-index lymph node lesions and spleen)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
3
The doses selected range from 40 to 70 mg BID (based on body weight, resulting in total daily doses ranging from 80 to 140 mg a day for 12 weeks in Part I and 1 year in Part II, or until marketing approval in Japan, whichever is longer.
Tokyo Medical And Dental University Hospital
Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
RECRUITINGHiroshima University Hospital
Hiroshima, Hiroshima City, Japan
RECRUITINGPart I: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events ((AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and AEs
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part II: Long-term Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events ((AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and AEs
Long-term Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events ((AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment
Time frame: At Day 252, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Part I: Change from baseline in clinical laboratory test results
Number of participants with change in clinical laboratory test results (hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis). Absolute values and change from baseline values of vital signs (including body weight) and ECG results at each visit will be listed for each patient and may be summarized using descriptive statistics. Tanner staging will be listed for each patient at each visit. Plots may also be used to display the patient data over time.
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part II: Long-term change from baseline in clinical laboratory test results
Number of participants with long-term change in clinical laboratory test results (hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis). Absolute values and change from baseline values of vital signs (including body weight) and ECG results at each visit will be listed for each patient and may be summarized using descriptive statistics. Tanner staging will be listed for each patient at each visit. Plots may also be used to display the patient data over time.
Time frame: At Day 252, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Part I: Change from baseline in vital signs
Number of Participants with change in vital signs
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Part II: Long-term change from baseline in vital signs
Number of Participants with long-term change in vital signs
Time frame: At Day 252, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Part I: Change from baseline in physical examination findings
Number of participants with change in physical examination findings
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part II: Long-term change from baseline in physical examination findings
Number of participants with long-term change in physical examination findings
Time frame: At Day 252, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Part I: Change from baseline in electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Number of participants with change in electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part II: Long-term change from baseline in electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Number of participants with long-term change in electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Time frame: At Day 252, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Part I: To assess the efficacy of leniolisib on lymphoproliferation (SPD of index lymph node lesions) and immunophenotype normalization (percentage of naïve B cells out of total B cells)
Number of patients with change in SPD of index lesions (selected as per the Cheson methodology from magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] or computed tomography \[CT\] imaging) at the end of treatment
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part I: Change from baseline in the percentage of naïve B cells out of total B cells at the end of treatment
Number of participants with change in percentage of naïve B cells out of total B cells at the end of treatment
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part I: Change from baseline in lymphoproliferation measured using MRI, CT imaging, or ultrasound
Parameters for change from baseline in lymphoproliferation as a secondary endpoint may include 3-dimensional (3D) volume of index and measurable non-index lesions (selected as per the Cheson methodology) and 3D volume and bi-dimensional sizes of spleen and liver, where appropriate.
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part II: Long-term change from baseline in lymphoproliferation measured using MRI, CT imaging, or ultrasound
Number of participants with change from in lymphoproliferation measured using MRI, CT imaging, or ultrasound (e.g., 3D volume of index and measurable non-index lesions \[selected as per the Cheson methodology\] and 3D volume and bi-dimensional sizes of spleen and liver, where appropriate) at the end of treatment.
Time frame: At Day 252, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Part I: To assess the PK of leniolisib in the Japanese population
Number of participants with change in PK parameters (including but not limited to area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 12 hours after dosing at steady state \[AUC0-12,ss\] and maximum plasma concentration following drug administration at steady state \[Cmax,ss\])
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part I: To assess the efficacy of leniolisib to modify health-related quality of life
Number of participants with change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Survey and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Classroom Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI-CIQ) summary scores
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part II: To assess the long-term efficacy of leniolisib to modify health-related quality of life
Number of participants with long-term change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Survey and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Classroom Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI-CIQ) summary scores
Time frame: At Day 252, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Part I: To assess the efficacy of leniolisib by the Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments
Number of participants with long-term change in visual analog scales (VAS) for Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments, measured by scale with no and maximal activity score
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part I: To assess the frequency of infections and assessment of impact on other disease-related outcomes (e.g., cytopenia, colitis, and lung function)
Number of participants with change in frequency of infections, use of antibiotics, Ig replacement therapy, and other disease complications
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part I: To assess biomarkers reflecting the efficacy of leniolisib to reduce systemic inflammatory components of the disease
Number of participants with change in High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), beta2 microglobulin, ferritin, fibrinogen, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85
Part I: To assess the treatment benefit to individual patients
Number of patients that benefit from the treatment via narratives by the Investigator
Time frame: Between baseline until Day 85