This clinical will evaluate the safety, tolerability and early efficacy of pirenidone in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis.
Background: Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis (RAP) is occurrence of 2 or more distinct episodes of Acute Pancreatitis (AP) (separated by at least 3 months). RAP not only leads to significant morbidity and reduced quality of life; patients with RAP have a substantial (up to 40%) risk of progressing to chronic pancreatitis (CP). Unfortunately, there is no therapy, which can help prevent future attacks of pancreatitis in RAP patients. In this regard, our published work suggest that pirfenidone, a therapy approved by FDA for the treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), has the potential to emerge as a novel treatment for patients with RAP. Briefly, our results suggest that: 1) Pirfenidone, when administered prophylactically, reduces the risk of AP development; 2) Pirfenidone, when given to experimental animals with severe AP, leads to amelioration of local and systemic injury; and 3) Pirfenidone, when administered to experimental animals with ongoing RAP, reduces risk of progression to CP. Thus, our results suggest that pirfenidone has potential to emerge as novel therapeutic strategy for RAP patients. These studies have high translational value as pirfenidone is already in clinical use for IPF and has over 8 years of record of safety. Hypothesis: "Pirfenidone treatment in patients with RAP will be safe, tolerable, and efficacious." Objectives: The study has following primary and secondary objectives. Primary Objective: 1) To evaluate the safety and tolerability of pirfenidone compared to placebo, in patients with RAP. 2) To evaluate the efficacy of pirfenidone in reducing the laboratory markers of inflammation. Secondary Objective: 1) To evaluate the efficacy of pirfenidone in reducing- a) recurrence of AP; b) pancreatitis related emergency room visits and readmissions; c) severity of pancreatitis, if acute pancreatitis was to develop; d) Improving quality of life measures; e) Improvement in patient reported outcomes. 2) To develop a predictive biomarker of efficacy of pirfenidone, which can be incorporated in a future clinical trial. Specific aims and study design. Pilot Clinical Trial of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in RAP. We will conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled pilot trial of pirfenidone in patients with RAP. RAP patients, 18-85 years of age who meet the eligibility criteria, will be recruited at one of the three participating sites (UAB, Mayo clinic Rochester and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston), and randomly assigned to pirfenidone or placebo treatment for 6 months. The primary endpoints of this clinical trial are a) feasibility; and b) safety. We have multiple efficacy secondary endpoints endpoint like cumulative incidence and rate of recurrent attacks of AP, severity of recurrent attacks of AP (mild/moderate/severe), readmissions and/or ER visits for pain, changes in quality of life as measured by PANQOLI and SF-12 health survey questionnaires, and changes in changes in patient reported outcome as measured by PAN-PROMISE score. We plan to recruit 60 patients at the three study sites over the duration of this clinical trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
60
Pirfenidone Days 1-7: 267 mg PO TID (801 mg/day) Days 8-14: 534 mg PO TID (1602 mg/day) Day 15 and thereafter: 801 mg PO TID; not to exceed 2403 mg/day Duration of treatment- total 6 months
Placebo
UAB
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGMayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGAdverse Event
Development of anticipated or un-anticipated serious adverse events (class 3-4)
Time frame: 6 months
Development of Recurrent AP
Cumulative incidence and rate of recurrent attacks of AP over 2 year period following randomization into drug/placebo
Time frame: 2 years
Severity of Recurrent Attacks of AP
Classified as mild/moderate/severe
Time frame: 2 years
ER Visits
Readmissions and/or ER visits for pain but not AP, over 2 years following randomization into drug/placebo
Time frame: 2 years
QOL
SF-12 (0-100, higher score means better physical and mental health functioning)
Time frame: 2 years
Patient reported outcomes
Changes in patient reported outcome as measured by PAN-PROMISE score (0-70, with higher score meaning worse symptoms)
Time frame: 2 years
Laboratory Marker of Inflammation
Changes in the laboratory markers of inflammation CRP
Time frame: 2 years
Laboratory Marker of Inflammation
Changes in the laboratory markers of inflammation IL-10
Time frame: 2 years
Laboratory Marker of Inflammation
Santhi Swaroop Vege, M.D.
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Changes in the laboratory markers of inflammation TNF-α
Time frame: 2 years
Laboratory Marker of Inflammation
Changes in the laboratory markers of inflammation IL-1
Time frame: 2 years
Laboratory Marker of Inflammation
Changes in the laboratory markers of inflammation IL-6
Time frame: 2 years
Laboratory Marker of Inflammation
Changes in the laboratory markers of inflammation Angiopoietin-2
Time frame: 2 years
Development of CP
Fecal Elastase
Time frame: 2 years
Development of Chronic Pancreatitis
Development of CP, as evaluated by secretin MRCP at the end of the study
Time frame: 2 years
Development of Diabetes
hemoglobin A1C
Time frame: 2 years
Development of Diabetes
Fasting blood sugar
Time frame: 2 years